Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124216›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Feasibility of Postoperative Home Monitoring Using Video Consultation and Vital Sign Monitoring of Bariatric Patients.

L M G Nijland, R N van Veen, A T Ruys, C L van Veldhuisen, T H Geerdink, S M M de Castro

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L M G NijlandDepartment of Surgery, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.m.g.nijland@olvg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-3574
R N van VeenDepartment of Surgery, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A T RuysDepartment of Surgery, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C L van VeldhuisenDepartment of Surgery, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T H GeerdinkDepartment of Surgery, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S M M de CastroDepartment of Surgery, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
OLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe length of hospital stay after bariatric surgery has decreased rapidly in recent years to an average of 1 day (one midnight). The transition from a controlled hospital environment to home environment may be a big step for patients. For these patients, home monitoring can be a substitute.

methodsA pilot study of 84 morbidly obese patients undergoing either laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LGS) was performed. Home monitoring consisted of daily contact via video consultation and measurement of vital signs at home. The primary outcome was feasibility of home monitoring. Secondary outcomes were complications and patient satisfaction measured with a questionnaire (PSQ-18).

resultsIn 77 of the 84 patients (92%), videoconference was possible on day 1, 74 patients (88%) on day 2 and 76 patients (90%) on day 3. Four patients (5%) were never reached. On day 1, 52 patients (62%) performed all instructed measurements, on day 2, 49 patients (58%) and on day 3, 63 patients (75%). Only 47 out of 84 patients (56%) measured the instructed amount of times on all 3 days. High satisfaction rates were reported in the patients receiving home monitoring.

conclusionOur first experience with home monitoring was disappointing since home monitoring of vital signs had poor compliance and not all patients were able to use the application. Further refinement of the home monitoring tool is needed to increase compliance and utility of the tool.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidTelemedicineFeasibility StudiesGastrectomyHumansPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVital SignsBariatric surgeryMonitoringPostoperativeRemote consultationTelemedicineVital signsWearable

Identifiers

PMID32124216
OpenAlexW3009143091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.