Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124186›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2020

Obesity is an initiator of colon adenomas but not a promoter of colorectal cancer in the Black Women's Health Study.

Chiranjeev Dash, Jeffrey Yu, Sarah Nomura, Jiachen Lu, Lynn Rosenberg, Julie R Palmer, Lucile L Adams-Campbell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Validation of a Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Model in US Black Women.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Colorectal Cancer in Younger Adults.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiranjeev DashGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Jeffrey YuSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah NomuraGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Jiachen LuGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Lynn RosenbergSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Julie R PalmerSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Lucile L Adams-CampbellGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. lla9@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-3884
Georgetown University · USBoston University · US

Funding

A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenU01CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Kimberly A. Bertrand, Yvette C Cozier · 2017 to 2026
$24.0M
FOLLOW-UP STUDY FOR CAUSES OF ILLNESS IN BLACK WOMENR01CA058420 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 1999 to 2013
$20.7M
TRAINING GRANT IN TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009686 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA Tate RIEGEL, DAVID J ROBBINS · 1996 to 2026
$10.8M
Molecular Epidemiology of Oxidative Stress and Related Cancers in Black WomenK07CA197112 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DASH, CHIRANJEEV · 2016 to 2020
$655k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA197112NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058420NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009686NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164974NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA164974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence for the association of anthropometrics with colorectal neoplasms is limited for African Americans.

methodsWe examined anthropometric measures with both colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in the ongoing Black Women's Health Study. In a nested case-control analysis, 954 cases of colorectal adenoma were compared with 3,816 polyp-free controls, matched on age and follow-up time. For the CRC analyses, 413 incident CRC cases were identified over a 16-year follow-up (802,783 person-years). Adenoma cases and CRC were verified by medical record review. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression analyses (for adenoma) and Cox proportional hazards analyses (for CRC) that included anthropometric exposures and selected confounders.

resultsOverall body mass index (BMI) and other anthropometric factors were not associated with colorectal adenoma or cancer risk in Black women. However, increased risk of adenoma (but not CRC) was observed among especially related to adenomas in the proximal colon. Among women ≥ 50 years of age, risk of proximal adenoma increased 14% (95% CI 1.00, 1.31), 35% (95% CI 1.12, 1.63), and 25% (0.93, 1.68) with each standard deviation increase in BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio, respectively. None of the anthropometric factors were associated with young onset CRC or adenoma risk.

conclusionOur results suggest that obesity might be an initiator for colon adenomas but not a promoter for colorectal cancer among Black women.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAnthropometryBlack or African AmericanBody Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsObesityProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAfrican american womenBMIColorectal adenomaColorectal cancerObesity

Identifiers

PMID32124186
PMCPMC7144805
OpenAlexW3009754738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.