Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124118›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2020

PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples.

Mart van Dijk, Sascha B Duken, Rosemary M Delabre, Richard Stranz, Vincent Schlegel, Daniela Rojas Castro, Adeline Bernier, Paul Zantkuijl, Robert A C Ruiter, John B F de Wit and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Determinants of PrEP Uptake, Intention and Awareness in the Netherlands: A Socio-Spatial Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mart van DijkDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.vandijk@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6722-3979
Sascha B DukenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6380-7651
Rosemary M DelabreCommunity-Based Research Laboratory, Coalition PLUS, Pantin, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8468-3528
Richard StranzAIDES, Pantin, France.
Vincent SchlegelAIDES, Pantin, France.
Daniela Rojas CastroCommunity-Based Research Laboratory, Coalition PLUS, Pantin, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-1438
Adeline BernierCommunity-Based Research Laboratory, Coalition PLUS, Pantin, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5145-035X
Paul ZantkuijlSoa Aids Nederland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert A C RuiterDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-3258
John B F de WitDepartment of Social and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5895-7935
Kai J JonasDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6607-1993
Maastricht University · NLAidsfonds · NLUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increased availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP uptake has remained low. To promote uptake, factors related to PrEP interest among relevant target populations warrant investigation. The aim of this study was to provide an analysis of PrEP interest among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Netherlands, while taking study recruitment strategies into account. We recruited 154 MSM from an LGBT research panel (AmsterdamPinkPanel) and 272 MSM from convenience sampling. Both samples were part of the Flash! PrEP in Europe Survey and were compared on their PrEP interest, usage intentions, and sexual behavior. We conducted logistic regression analyses to discover variables associated with PrEP interest and intentions. Participants from the AmsterdamPinkPanel were less likely to use PrEP, had less knowledge of PrEP, and were less interested in PrEP than participants from convenience sampling. Significant covariates of PrEP interest were being single, more prior PrEP knowledge, sexual risk behaviors, such as not having used a condom during last sex and having ever used drugs in a sexual context, and not participating in the AmsterdamPinkPanel. Adding the recruitment strategy to the regression increased explained variance on top of predictors already described in the literature. Increased sexual risk behavior is related to increased PrEP interest and it helps to identify PrEP target groups. Recruitment strategies have a substantial impact on findings regarding PrEP interest and usage intentions. This study emphasizes the importance of using multiple strategies for recruiting participants to obtain a more comprehensive view of MSM's attitudes toward PrEP.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorYoung AdultHIV preventionMen who have sex with men (MSM)PrEPSexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID32124118
PMCPMC7316842
OpenAlexW3010450070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.