Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124102›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020

No date for the PROM: the association between patient-reported health events and clinical coding in primary care.

Paul J Barr, Scott A Berry, Wendolyn S Gozansky, Deanna B McQuillan, Colleen Ross, Don Carmichael, Andrea M Austin, Travis D Satterlund, Karen E Schifferdecker, Lora Council and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A multicenter international prospective study of the validity and reliability of a COVID-19-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul J BarrThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. Paul.J.Barr@dartmouth.edu.
Scott A BerryThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Wendolyn S GozanskyInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 10065 E. Harvard Ave, Denver, CO, 80231, USA.
Deanna B McQuillanInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 10065 E. Harvard Ave, Denver, CO, 80231, USA.
Colleen RossInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 10065 E. Harvard Ave, Denver, CO, 80231, USA.
Don CarmichaelThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Andrea M AustinThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Travis D SatterlundThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Karen E SchifferdeckerThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Lora CouncilThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Michelle D DannenbergThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Ariel T WamplerGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Eugene C NelsonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Jonathan SkinnerThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Dartmouth College · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Inas S Khayal · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
NIA NIH HHS AG019783-14NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt is unclear whether data from patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are captured and used by clinicians despite policy initiatives. We examined the extent to which fall risk and urinary incontinence (UI) reported on PROMS and provided to clinicians prior to a patient visit are subsequently captured in the electronic medical record (EMR). Additionally, we aimed to determine whether the use of PROMs and EMR documentation is higher for visits where PROM data was provided to clinicians.

designWe conducted a cross-sectional patient-reported risk assessment survey and semi-structured interviews with clinicians to identify themes related to the use of PROMs.

settingFourteen primary care clinics in the US (eight intervention and six control clinics), between October 2013 and May 2015.

participantsPrimary care clinicians and older adult (≥66 years) patients completing a 46-item health risk assessment, including PROMs for fall risk and UI.

interventionRisk assessment results provided to the clinician or nurse practitioners prior to the clinic visit in intervention clinics; data was not provided in control clinics. MAIN OUTCOME: 1) Agreement between ICD-9 codes of fall risk or UI in the EMR and patient-reports, and 2) clinician experience of PROMs use and impact on coding.

resultsA total of 505 older adult patients were included in the study, 176 at control clinics and 329 at intervention clinics. While patient reports of fall risk and UI were readily captured by PROMs, this information was only coded in the EMR between 3% - 14% of the time (poor Kappa agreement). Intervention clinics performed slightly better than control clinics. Clinician interviews (n = 16) revealed low use of PROMs data with multiple barriers cited including poor access to data, high quantity of data, interruption to workflow, and a lack of training on PROMs.

conclusionsCurrent strategies of providing PROMs data prior to clinic visits may not be an effective way of communicating important health information to busy clinicians; ultimately resulting in underuse. Better systems of presenting PROMs data, and clinician training on the importance of PROMs and their use, is needed.

Indexed as

Elderly, primary care/general practiceFalls and injuriesPatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32124102
PMCPMC7052084
OpenAlexW3012247897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.