Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124093›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2020

A Microfluidic Perfusion Platform for In Vitro Analysis of Drug Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Relationships.

Yadir A Guerrero, Diti Desai, Connor Sullivan, Erick Kindt, Mary E Spilker, Tristan S Maurer, Deepak E Solomon, Derek W Bartlett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A cell culture system to model pharmacokinetics using adjustable-volume perfused mixing chambers.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yadir A GuerreroNeofluidics, 6650 Lusk Blvd, Suite 101, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Diti DesaiNeofluidics, 6650 Lusk Blvd, Suite 101, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Connor SullivanNeofluidics, 6650 Lusk Blvd, Suite 101, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Erick KindtPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, & Metabolism, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., 10646 Science Center Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Mary E SpilkerPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, & Metabolism, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., 10646 Science Center Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Tristan S MaurerPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, & Metabolism, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.
Deepak E SolomonNeofluidics, 6650 Lusk Blvd, Suite 101, San Diego, California, 92121, USA. deepak@neofluidics.com.
Derek W BartlettPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, & Metabolism, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., 10646 Science Center Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA. Derek.Bartlett@pfizer.com.
GeneFluidics (United States) · USPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Static in vitro cell culture studies cannot capture the dynamic concentration profiles of drugs, nutrients, and other factors that cells experience in physiological systems. This limits the confidence in the translational relevance of in vitro experiments and increases the reliance on empirical testing of exposure-response relationships and dose optimization in animal models during preclinical drug development, introducing additional challenges owing to species-specific differences in drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Here, we describe the development of a microfluidic cell culture device that enables perfusion of cells under 2D or 3D culture conditions with temporally programmable concentration profiles. Proof-of-concept studies using doxorubicin and gemcitabine demonstrated the ability of the microfluidic PK-PD device to examine dose- and time-dependent effects of doxorubicin as well as schedule-dependent effects of doxorubicin and gemcitabine combination therapy on cell viability using both step-wise drug concentration profiles and species-specific (i.e., mouse, human) drug PK profiles. The results demonstrate the importance of including physiologically relevant dynamic drug exposure profiles during in vitro drug testing to more accurately mimic in vivo drug effects, thereby improving translatability across nonclinical studies and reducing the reliance on animal models during drug development.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesModels, BiologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCell SurvivalDeoxycytidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDoxorubicinGemcitabineHumansMCF-7 CellsPerfusionProof of Concept StudyTissue Culture TechniquesDeoxycytidineDoxorubicinGemcitabinemicrofluidicspharmacodynamicspharmacokineticstranslational pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID32124093
OpenAlexW3009194523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.