ReviewJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2020
Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.
Review in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Biologics for bone regeneration: advances in cell, protein, gene, and mRNA therapies.Bone research · 2026Review
- Piezoelectric scaffolds for bone regeneration: a systematic review of preclinical studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- A neurovascularized bone regeneration strategy for mandibular and alveolar bone defects based on elastin-like biomaterials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Treatment of femoral defects in rats with collagen and elastin polymers combined with hydroxyapatite and bone morphogenetic protein.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Bone regeneration using adipose derived stem cell spheroids within 3D printed scaffolds in a rabbit radial defect model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Study on the effect and mechanism of gold nanocoated magnesium bone scaffolds for bone repair.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Evaluation of bone regenerative potential of sticky bone combined with DPBM and APRF in a rabbit tibial model: an in vivo study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Mechanobiologically-optimized non-resorbable artificial bone for patient-matched scaffold-guided bone regeneration.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Enhancing Bone Scaffold Fabrication: A Comparative Study of Manual Casting and Automated 3D Bioprinting.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Biomimetic structural design in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Functionalized zeolite regulates bone metabolic microenvironment.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Bone Defect Treatment in Regenerative Medicine: Exploring Natural and Synthetic Bone Substitutes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bone Regeneration: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Injectable carboxymethyl chitosan/oxidized dextran hydrogels containing zoledronic acid modified strontium hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Bioprinted hydrogels in bone regeneration: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Application and progress of 3D printed biomaterials in osteoporosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Categories, applications, and potential of stem cells in bone regeneration: an overview.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Treatment of Bone Defects and Nonunion via Novel Delivery Mechanisms, Growth Factors, and Stem Cells: A Review.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Review
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bone tissue has an astonishing self-healing capacity yet only for non-critical size defects (<6 mm) and clinical intervention is needed for critical-size defects and beyond that along with non-union bone fractures and bone defects larger than critical size represent a major healthcare problem. Autografts are, still, being used as preferred to treat large bone defects. Mostly, due to the presence of living differentiated and progenitor cells, its osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties that allow osteogenesis, vascularization, and provide structural support. Bone tissue engineering strategies have been proposed to overcome the limited supply of grafts. Complete and successful bone regeneration can be influenced by several factors namely: the age of the patient, health, gender and is expected that the ideal scaffold for bone regeneration combines factors such as bioactivity and osteoinductivity. The commercially available products have as their main function the replacement of bone. Moreover, scaffolds still present limitations including poor osteointegration and limited vascularization. The introduction of pores in scaffolds are being used to promote the osteointegration as it allows cell and vessel infiltration. Moreover, combinations with growth factors or coatings have been explored as they can improve the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of the scaffold. This review focuses on the bone defects treatments and on the research of scaffolds for bone regeneration. Moreover, it summarizes the latest progress in the development of coatings used in bone tissue engineering. Despite the interesting advances which include the development of hybrid scaffolds, there are still important challenges that need to be addressed in order to fasten translation of scaffolds into the clinical scenario. Finally, we must reflect on the main challenges for bone tissue regeneration. There is a need to achieve a proper mechanical properties to bear the load of movements; have a scaffolds with a structure that fit the bone anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.