ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2019
The use of serial cardiac
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atrial Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis-Case Presentation and Systematic Review.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Pooled it
- Current uses and understanding of PET imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- The clinical value of quantitative cardiovascular molecular imaging: a step towards precision medicine.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Cardiac sarcoidosis: the role of cardiac MRI andThe British journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Ten Questions Cardiologists Should Be Able to Answer About Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Case-Based Approach and Contemporary Review.CJC open · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinically evident cardiac involvement has been documented in 5% of sarcoidosis patients, primarily manifesting as heart block, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. Heart Rhythm Society consensus guidelines recommend advanced cardiac imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, given endomyocardial biopsy's low sensitivity. CASE SUMMARY: We describe four patients with cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosed with FDG-PET scan performed using a standardized imaging protocol for cardiac sarcoidosis. Serial FDG-PET scans were performed to monitor disease progression and response to therapy. Patients 1 and 2 presented with heart block, Patient 3 with heart failure and ventricular tachycardia (VT), and Patient 4 with VT. Patient 1 showed an initial decrease in standard uptake value (SUV) on immunosuppression, followed by an increase in SUV, necessitating steroid therapy. Patient 2's SUV decreased on immunosuppression. Patient 3 required 3.5 years of immunosuppression for the SUV to decrease to inactive disease levels, with SUV increasing and decreasing at different times during treatment, and subsequently developed VT. For Patient 4, areas of inflammation on the initial scan matched low voltage areas on the patient's EP study, confirming the arrhythmia's pathophysiological basis. DISCUSSION: Cardiac sarcoidosis progression and response to therapy are heterogeneous. Serial FDG-PET scans are useful to diagnose disease, tailor therapy, and monitor the clinical course of disease, allowing treatment decisions to be based on the quantitative level of inflammation seen on FDG-PET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.