Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32123730›Full record

ReviewACS central science2020

Simplicity in the Design, Operation, and Applications of Mechanically Interlocked Molecular Machines.

Andrew W Heard, Stephen M Goldup

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS central science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tangled Tail of Mechanically Interlocked Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Supramolecular Chemistry in Metal-Organic Framework Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emerging mechanically interlocked cages.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stretchable poly[2]rotaxane elastomers.Fundamental research · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial molecular machines: Design and observation.Smart molecules : open access · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew W HeardSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Stephen M GoldupSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanically interlocked molecules are perhaps best known as components of molecular machines, a view further reinforced by the Nobel Prize in 2016 to Stoddart and Sauvage. Despite amazing progress since these pioneers of the field reported the first examples of molecular shuttles, genuine applications of interlocked molecular machines remain elusive, and many barriers remain to be overcome before such molecular devices make the transition from impressive prototypes on the laboratory bench to useful products. Here, we discuss simplicity as a design principle that could be applied in the development of the next generation of molecular machines with a view to moving toward real-world applications of these intriguing systems in the longer term.

Identifiers

PMID32123730
PMCPMC7047278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.