Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32123686›Full record

ArticleComputing in cardiology2019

Effects of Interpolation on the Inverse Problem of Electrocardiography.

Y S Dogrusoz, L R Bear, J Bergquist, R Dubois, W Good, R S MacLeod, A Rababah, J Stoks

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computing in cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Y S DogrusozElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, METU, Ankara, Turkey.
L R BearIHU-LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
J BergquistDept. of Bioengineering and SCI Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (UT), USA.
R DuboisIHU-LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
W GoodDept. of Bioengineering and SCI Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (UT), USA.
R S MacLeodDept. of Bioengineering and SCI Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (UT), USA.
A RababahFaculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment, Ulster University, United Kingdom.
J StoksMaastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
University of Utah · USElectrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute · FRMaastricht University · NLMiddle East Technical University · TRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing Legacy TransitionR24GM136986 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2020 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM136986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) aims to reconstruct electrograms from the body surface potential measurements. Bad leads are usually excluded from the inverse problem solution. Alternatively, interpolation can be applied. This study explores how sensitive ECGI is to different bad-lead configurations and interpolation methods. Experimental data from a Langendorff-perfused pig heart suspended in a human-shaped torso-tank was used. Epicardial electrograms were acquired during 30 s (31 beats) of RV pacing using a 108-electrode array, simultaneously with torso potentials from 128 electrodes embedded in the tank surface. Six different bad lead cases were designed based on clinical experience. Inverse problem was solved by applying Tikhonov regularization i) using the complete data, ii) bad-leads-removed data, and iii) interpolated data, with 5 different methods. Our results showed that ECGI accuracy of an interpolation method highly depends on the location of the bad leads. If they are in the high-potential-gradient regions of the torso, a highly accurate interpolation method is needed to achieve an ECGI accuracy close to using complete data. If the BSP reconstruction of the interpolation method is poor in these regions, the reconstructed electrograms also have lower accuracy, suggesting that bad leads should be removed instead of interpolated. The inverse-forward method was found to be the best among all interpolation methods applied in this study in terms of both missing BSP lead reconstruction and ECGI accuracy, even for the bad leads located over the chest.

Identifiers

PMID32123686
PMCPMC7051038
OpenAlexW2995193913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.