Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32123321›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2020

Community rescue in experimental phytoplankton communities facing severe herbicide pollution.

Vincent Fugère, Marie-Pier Hébert, Naíla Barbosa da Costa, Charles C Y Xu, Rowan D H Barrett, Beatrix E Beisner, Graham Bell, Gregor F Fussmann, B Jesse Shapiro, Viviane Yargeau and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Keystone communities can rescue aquatic metacommunities influenced by pesticide contamination.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impacts of limits to adaptation on population and community persistence in a changing environment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ecological limits to evolutionary rescue.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vincent FugèreDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada. vincent.fugere@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1877-5755
Marie-Pier HébertDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4733-0974
Naíla Barbosa da CostaDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-933X
Charles C Y XuDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-8879
Rowan D H BarrettDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-2531
Beatrix E BeisnerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Québec at Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-6887
Graham BellDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-6391
Gregor F FussmannDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-0122
B Jesse ShapiroDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-8699
Viviane YargeauDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-276X
Andrew GonzalezDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada. andrew.gonzalez@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-8081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community rescue occurs when ecological or evolutionary processes restore positive growth in a highly stressful environment that was lethal to the community in its ancestral form, thus averting biomass collapse in a deteriorating environment. Laboratory evidence suggests that community rescue is most likely in high-biomass communities that have previously experienced moderate doses of sublethal stress. We assessed this result under more natural conditions, in a mesocosm experiment with phytoplankton communities exposed to the ubiquitous herbicide glyphosate. We tested whether community biomass and prior herbicide exposure would facilitate community rescue after severe contamination. We found that prior exposure to glyphosate was a very strong predictor of the rescue outcome, while high community biomass was not. Furthermore, although glyphosate had negative effects on diversity, it did not influence community composition significantly, suggesting a modest role for genus sorting in this rescue process. Our results expand the scope of community rescue theory to complex ecosystems and confirm that prior stress exposure is a key predictor of rescue.

Indexed as

HerbicidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiomassEcosystemPhytoplanktonHerbicidesWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.