Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32123070›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation.

Jean-François Patri, David J Ostry, Julien Diard, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Pamela Trudeau-Fisette, Christophe Savariaux, Pascal Perrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean-François PatriGIPSA-lab UMR 5216, Grenoble INP, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
David J OstryDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada H3A 1G1.
Julien DiardLaboratoire de Psychologie et de Neurocognition (LPNC) UMR 5105, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, F-38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0673-477X
Jean-Luc SchwartzGIPSA-lab UMR 5216, Grenoble INP, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Pamela Trudeau-FisetteLaboratoire de Phonétique, Center For Research on Brain, Language, and Music, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H2X 1L7.
Christophe SavariauxGIPSA-lab UMR 5216, Grenoble INP, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Pascal PerrierGIPSA-lab UMR 5216, Grenoble INP, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, F-38000 Grenoble, France; Pascal.Perrier@grenoble-inp.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2192-4176

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Sensory Basis for Speech Motor LearningR01DC017439 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OSTRY, DAVID J · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory speech perception enables listeners to access phonological categories from speech sounds. During speech production and speech motor learning, speakers' experience matched auditory and somatosensory input. Accordingly, access to phonetic units might also be provided by somatosensory information. The present study assessed whether humans can identify vowels using somatosensory feedback, without auditory feedback. A tongue-positioning task was used in which participants were required to achieve different tongue postures within the /e, ε, a/ articulatory range, in a procedure that was totally nonspeech like, involving distorted visual feedback of tongue shape. Tongue postures were measured using electromagnetic articulography. At the end of each tongue-positioning trial, subjects were required to whisper the corresponding vocal tract configuration with masked auditory feedback and to identify the vowel associated with the reached tongue posture. Masked auditory feedback ensured that vowel categorization was based on somatosensory feedback rather than auditory feedback. A separate group of subjects was required to auditorily classify the whispered sounds. In addition, we modeled the link between vowel categories and tongue postures in normal speech production with a Bayesian classifier based on the tongue postures recorded from the same speakers for several repetitions of the /e, ε, a/ vowels during a separate speech production task. Overall, our results indicate that vowel categorization is possible with somatosensory feedback alone, with an accuracy that is similar to the accuracy of the auditory perception of whispered sounds, and in congruence with normal speech articulation, as accounted for by the Bayesian classifier.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalPhoneticsAdultFemaleHumansMalePalateSensationSpeech PerceptionSpeech Production MeasurementTongueYoung Adultcategorical perceptionsomatosensory feedbackspeech production

Identifiers

PMID32123070
PMCPMC7084080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.