Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32123031›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2020

Human Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4-α Encodes Isoforms with Distinct Transcriptional Functions.

Élie Lambert, Jean-Philippe Babeu, Joël Simoneau, Jennifer Raisch, Laurie Lavergne, Dominique Lévesque, Émilie Jolibois, Mariano Avino, Michelle S Scott, François Boudreau and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-Alpha: a key regulator in liver carcinogenesis.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4 Alpha: A Key Regulator of Liver Disease Pathology and Haemostatic Disorders.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Élie LambertDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Jean-Philippe BabeuDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Joël SimoneauDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Jennifer RaischDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Laurie LavergneDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Dominique LévesqueDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Émilie JoliboisDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Mariano AvinoDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
Michelle S ScottDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada.
François BoudreauDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada. Electronic address: francois.boudreau@usherbrooke.ca.
Francois-Michel BoisvertDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1E 4K8, Canada. Electronic address: fm.boisvert@usherbrooke.ca.
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-123469CIHR PJT-156180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HNF4α is a nuclear receptor produced as 12 isoforms from two promoters by alternative splicing. To characterize the transcriptional capacities of all 12 HNF4α isoforms, stable lines expressing each isoform were generated. The entire transcriptome associated with each isoform was analyzed as well as their respective interacting proteome. Major differences were noted in the transcriptional function of these isoforms. The α1 and α2 isoforms were the strongest regulators of gene expression whereas the α3 isoform exhibited significantly reduced activity. The α4, α5, and α6 isoforms, which use an alternative first exon, were characterized for the first time, and showed a greatly reduced transcriptional potential with an inability to recognize the consensus response element of HNF4α. Several transcription factors and coregulators were identified as potential specific partners for certain HNF4α isoforms. An analysis integrating the vast amount of omics data enabled the identification of transcriptional regulatory mechanisms specific to certain HNF4α isoforms, hence demonstrating the importance of considering all isoforms given their seemingly diverse functions.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticCell Line, TumorDNAGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HumansProtein BindingProtein IsoformsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearResponse ElementsTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeDNAGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4Protein IsoformsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearTranscription Factorsaffinity proteomicsbioinformaticscolorectal cancernuclear receptorsprotein isoformsquantificationRNA SEQSILACtranscriptionTranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID32123031
PMCPMC7196586
OpenAlexW3010322897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.