Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32122406›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2020

Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals and the environment: an African perspective.

Zuhura I Kimera, Stephen E Mshana, Mark M Rweyemamu, Leonard E G Mboera, Mecky I N Matee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Two-Year Study on Swifts (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Antimicrobial usage in broiler poultry farms in Zambia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zuhura I KimeraDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. zuhurakimera@gmail.com.
Stephen E MshanaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Mark M RweyemamuSACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Chuo Kikuu Morogoro, Tanzania.
Leonard E G MboeraSACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Chuo Kikuu Morogoro, Tanzania.
Mecky I N MateeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sokoine University of Agriculture · TZCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe overuse of antimicrobials in food animals and the subsequent contamination of the environment have been associated with development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. This review presents information on antimicrobial use, resistance and status of surveillance systems in food animals and the environment in Africa.

methodsInformation was searched through PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and African Journal Online databases. Full-length original research and review articles on antimicrobial use, prevalence of AMR from Africa covering a period from 2005 to 2018 were examined. The articles were scrutinized to extract information on the antimicrobial use, resistance and surveillance systems.

resultsA total of 200 articles were recovered. Of these, 176 studies were included in the review while 24 articles were excluded because they were not relevant to antimicrobial use and/or resistance in food animals and the environment. The percentage of farms using antimicrobials in animal production ranged from 77.6% in Nigeria to 100% in Tanzania, Cameroon, Zambia, Ghana and Egypt. The most antibiotics used were tetracycline, aminoglycoside and penicillin groups. The percentage of multi drug resistant isolates ranged from 20% in Nigeria to 100% in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Tunisia. In the environment, percentage of multi drug resistant isolates ranged from 33.3% in South Africa to 100% in Algeria. None of the countries documented national antimicrobial use and resistance surveillance system in animals.

conclusionThere is high level of antimicrobial use, especially tetracycline, aminoglycoside and penicillin in animal production systems in Africa. This is likely to escalate the already high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and multi drug resistance in the continent. This, coupled with weak antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems in the region is a great concern to the animals, environment and humans as well.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAfricaAminoglycosidesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipFood MicrobiologyPenicillinsPopulation SurveillanceTetracyclineAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillinsTetracyclineAfricaAntimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial useEnvironmentFood animalsSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32122406
PMCPMC7053060
OpenAlexW3012411233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.