Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32122394›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2020

Comparing self-reported medication adherence measures with hair antiretroviral concentration among people living with HIV in Guangxi, China.

Quan Zhang, Xiaoming Li, Shan Qiao, Zhiyong Shen, Yuejiao Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Quan ZhangSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29028, USA. quanz@mailbox.sc.edu.
Xiaoming LiSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29028, USA.
Shan QiaoSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29028, USA.
Zhiyong ShenGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yuejiao ZhouGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
University of South Carolina · USGuangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CN

Funding

Theory-based HIV Disclosure Intervention for ParentsR01HD074221 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, XIAOMING · 2012 to 2017
$1.7M
Mechanisms of the effect of HIV disclosure on clinical outcomes: A longitudinal studyR21AI122919 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI QIAO, SHAN · 2016 to 2017
$362k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI122919NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074221NIH HHS R01HD074221NIH HHS R21AI122919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiretroviral adherence is essential to HIV treatment efficacy. Various self-reported measures are commonly used for assessing antiretroviral adherence. Limited data are available regarding the validity of those self-reported measures in comparison with long-term objective biomarkers of adherence measures such as hair measures.

methodsSelf-reported adherence (frequency, percentage, and visual analog scale [VAS]) and hair tenofovir concentration were evaluated at a single time point from 268 people living with HIV in China. The responses to each of three self-reported measures were converted into percentage and then dichotomized as "optimal" (100%) vs. "suboptimal" (less than 100%) adherence. Two composite adherence scores (CAS) were created from the three self-reported measures: (1) an overall adherence was the average percentage of the three self-reported measures; (2) responses were termed optimal adherence if participants reporting optimal adherence in all three self-reported measures, while were termed suboptimal adherence. Hair tenofovir concentration was also dichotomized as "optimal" (above the limit of quantitation, 36 pg/mg) vs. "suboptimal" adherence (blow 36 pg/mg). Spearman correlation, kappa statistics, and logistic regression analysis were used to calculate the correlations, agreements, and predictions of self-reported measures with hair measure, respectively.

resultsOverall adherence, but any of the three self-reported adherence, was correlated with hair tenofovir concentration (r = 0.13, p < 0.05). Self-reported optimal adherence in VAS and CAS measures were agreed with and predicted optimal adherence assessed by hair measure (Kappa = 0.107, adjusted OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.03-3.45; Kappa = 0.109, adjusted OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.18; all p < 0.05, respectively).

conclusionVAS may be a good individual self-reported measure for antiretroviral adherence, and CAS may be a good composite self-reported measure for antiretroviral adherence.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAnti-HIV AgentsChinaFemaleHairHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesTenofovirTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV AgentsTenofovirAntiretroviral adherenceHair concentrationPeople living with HIVSelf-reportTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID32122394
PMCPMC7053048
OpenAlexW3010859639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.