ArticleBMC plant biology2020
Effects of shade stress on turfgrasses morphophysiology and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sucrose and pipecolic acid-mediated enrichment of rhizosphere Rhizobiale-Burkholderiale bacteria improves soybean growth under low-light conditions.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Optimizing the growth and flowering of Rosa hybrida L. (Roses) through synergistic light and biostimulant management.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Response of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities to reduced light intensity in tomato plant.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Unraveling the effects of shading on sensory quality, non-volatile metabolites and volatile flavor compounds of Longjing tea.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Synergistic Effects of Biochar andMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Effects of chicken and pig manures application on heavy metal in different soil types and on bacterial in the rhizosphere soil of Chinese cabbage.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Evaluation of different bermudagrass germplasm at physiological and molecular level under shade along longitudinal and latitudinal gradients.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- A comprehensive assessment of photosynthetic acclimation to shade in C4 grass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced resistance to low-temperature weak-light stress in snapdragon (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- Role of tillage measures in mitigating waterlogging damage in rapeseed.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Microbial seed coating: An attractive tool for sustainable agriculture.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Review
- Prokaryotic diversity and community structure in the rhizosphere of Lantana weed (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- Impacts of Intercropped Maize Ecological Shading on Tea Foliar and Functional Components, Insect Pest Diversity and Soil Microbes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bermudagrass Cultivars with Different Tolerance to Nematode Damage Are Characterized by Distinct Fungal but Similar Bacterial and Archaeal Microbiomes.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- The BBX gene family in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis): identification, characterization and expression profiles.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Predominant Microbial Colonizers in the Root Endosphere and Rhizosphere of Turfgrass Systems:Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe shade represents one of the major environmental limitations for turfgrass growth. Shade influences plant growth and alters plant metabolism, yet little is known about how shade affects the structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities and the role of soil microorganisms in plant shade responses. In this study, a glasshouse experiment was conducted to examine the impact of shade on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of two contrasting shade-tolerant turfgrasses, shade-tolerant dwarf lilyturf (Ophiopogon japonicus, OJ) and shade-intolerant perennial turf-type ryegrass (Lolium perenne, LP). We also examined soil-plant feedback effects on shade tolerance in the two turfgrass genotypes. The composition of the soil bacterial community was assayed using high-throughput sequencing.
resultsOJ maintained higher photosynthetic capacity and root growth than LP under shade stress, thus OJ was found to be more shade-tolerant than LP. Shade-intolerant LP responded better to both shade and soil microbes than shade-tolerant OJ. The shade and live soil decreased LP growth, but increased biomass allocation to shoots in the live soil. The plant shade response index of LP is higher in live soil than sterile soil, driven by weakened soil-plant feedback under shade stress. In contrast, there was no difference in these values for OJ under similar shade and soil treatments. Shade stress had little impact on the diversity of the OJ and the LP bacterial communities, but instead impacted their composition. The OJ soil bacterial communities were mostly composed of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria. Further pairwise fitting analysis showed that a positive correlation of shade-tolerance in two turfgrasses and their bacterial community compositions. Several soil properties (NO
conclusionSoil microorganisms mediate plant responses to shade stress via plant-soil feedback and shade-induced change in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure for OJ and LP plants. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding plant-soil interactions and their role in the mechanisms underlying shade tolerance in shade-tolerant turfgrasses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.