Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32122123›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2020

Comparing the Use of Silicone Wristbands, Hand Wipes, And Dust to Evaluate Children's Exposure to Flame Retardants and Plasticizers.

Stephanie C Hammel, Kate Hoffman, Allison L Phillips, Jessica L Levasseur, Amelia M Lorenzo, Thomas F Webster, Heather M Stapleton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A transdisciplinary process-oriented approach to evaluate infant exposure to indoor dust.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie C HammelNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5334-2045
Kate HoffmanNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8029-7710
Allison L PhillipsNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
Jessica L LevasseurNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
Amelia M LorenzoNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
Thomas F WebsterBoston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States.
Heather M StapletonNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9995-6517
Duke University · USBoston University · US

Funding

Children's Exposure to Flame Retardants: Effects on Thyroid Hormone RegulationR01ES016099 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STAPLETON, HEATHER M · 2008 to 2017
$5.0M
Duke University Program in Environmental HealthT32ES021432 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Akhenaton-Andrew Dhafir Jones, Joel Newman Meyer · 2013 to 2026
$4.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016099NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES021432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organophosphate esters (OPEs) are applied as additive flame retardants, and along with phthalates, are also used as plasticizers in consumer products. As such, human exposure is common and chronic. Deployed as personal passive samplers, silicone wristbands have been shown to detect over a thousand industrial and consumer product chemicals; however, few studies have evaluated chemical concentrations with their corresponding biomarkers of exposure, especially in children. Further, little is known about how well the wristbands predict individual exposure compared to existing validated external exposure tools such as indoor air, dust, and hand wipes. Here, we analyzed wristbands worn by children (ages 3-6) for 18 OPEs and 10 phthalates and compared them to corresponding urinary biomarkers. In wristbands, 13 of 18 OPEs and all phthalates were detected in >80% of wristbands, and 6 OPEs and 4 phthalates were significantly associated with corresponding urinary metabolites (

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorFlame RetardantsChildChild, PreschoolDustEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOrganophosphatesPlasticizersSiliconesDustFlame RetardantsOrganophosphatesPlasticizersSilicones

Identifiers

PMID32122123
PMCPMC7430043
OpenAlexW3009661489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.