ArticleCells2020
The Potential of Computational Modeling to Predict Disease Course and Treatment Response in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- NX210c Demonstrates Therapeutic Potential to Restore Blood-Brain Barrier in a QSP Model of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Therapeutic targeting of oligodendrocytes in an agent-based model of multiple sclerosis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Advancing Alzheimer's Therapy: Computational strategies and treatment innovations.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Scoping review of clinical decision support systems for multiple sclerosis management: Leveraging information technology and massive health data.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- An overview of immunotoxicity in drug discovery and development.Toxicology letters · 2025Review
- System-level hypothesis of dopamine imbalance in early multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Multiple sclerosis subgroups: Data-driven clusters based on patient-reported outcomes and a large clinical sample.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2024Article
- An extensible and unifying approach to retrospective clinical data modeling: the BrainTeaser Ontology.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Beyond the state of the art of reverse vaccinology: predicting vaccine efficacy with the universal immune system simulator for influenza.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Moving forward through the in silico modeling of multiple sclerosis: Treatment layer implementation and validation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- In silico clinical trials for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with MS TreatSim.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- In silico design of recombinant multi-epitope vaccine against influenza A virus.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Computational modelling and simulation for immunotoxicity prediction induced by skin sensitisers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021Article
- Verification of an agent-based disease model of human Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- TowardsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Moving forward through the in silico modeling of tuberculosis: a further step with UISS-TB.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- In silico trial to test COVID-19 candidate vaccines: a case study with UISS platform.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As of today, 20 disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) have been approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and, based on their efficacy, they can be grouped into moderate-efficacy DMDs and high-efficacy DMDs. The choice of the drug mostly relies on the judgment and experience of neurologists and the evaluation of the therapeutic response can only be obtained by monitoring the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) status during follow up. In an era where therapies are focused on personalization, this study aims to develop a modeling infrastructure to predict the evolution of relapsing MS and the response to treatments. We built a computational modeling infrastructure named Universal Immune System Simulator (UISS), which can simulate the main features and dynamics of the immune system activities. We extended UISS to simulate all the underlying MS pathogenesis and its interaction with the host immune system. This simulator is a multi-scale, multi-organ, agent-based simulator with an attached module capable of simulating the dynamics of specific biological pathways at the molecular level. We simulated six MS patients with different relapsing-remitting courses. These patients were characterized based on their age, sex, presence of oligoclonal bands, therapy, and MRI lesion load at the onset. The simulator framework is made freely available and can be used following the links provided in the availability section. Even though the model can be further personalized employing immunological parameters and genetic information, we generated a few simulation scenarios for each patient based on the available data. Among these simulations, it was possible to find the scenarios that realistically matched the real clinical and MRI history. Moreover, for two patients, the simulator anticipated the timing of subsequent relapses, which occurred, suggesting that UISS may have the potential to assist MS specialists in predicting the course of the disease and the response to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.