ArticleCancers2020
Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Workflow for MR-Guided Volumetric Arc Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiologically Relevant Organotypic Tissue Slice Model for Evaluating Cell Responses to Ionizing Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Animal Models for Radiotherapy Research: All (Animal) Models Are Wrong but Some Are Useful.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is increased interest in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for guiding radiation therapy (RT) in the clinical setting. In this regard, preclinical studies can play an important role in understanding the added value of MRI in RT planning. In the present study, we developed and validated a clinically relevant integrated workflow for MRI-guided volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) in a VX2 rabbit neck tumor model of HNSCC. In addition to demonstrating safety and feasibility, we examined the therapeutic impact of MR-guided VMAT using a single high dose to obtain proof-of-concept and compared the response to conventional 2D-RT. Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) provided excellent soft tissue contrast for accurate tumor segmentation for VMAT. Notably, MRI-guided RT enabled improved tumor targeting ability and minimal dose to organs at risk (OAR) compared to 2D-RT, which resulted in notable morbidity within a few weeks of RT. Our results highlight the value of integrating MRI into the workflow for VMAT for improved delineation of tumor anatomy and optimal treatment planning. The model combined with the multimodal imaging approach can serve as a valuable platform for the conduct of preclinical RT trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.