ArticlePolymers2020
Micro-Ultrasonic Viscosity Model Based on Ultrasonic-Assisted Vibration Micro-Injection for High-Flow Length Ratio Parts.
Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on Quality Characterization Method of Micro-Injection Products Based on Cavity Pressure.Polymers · 2021Article
- Article
- Fabrication of Micro Ultrasonic Powder Molding Polypropylene Part with Hydrophobic Patterned Surface.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A micro-ultrasonic (MU) viscosity model based on ultrasonic-assisted vibration micro-injection for high- flow length ratio polymer parts was established. This model considered the effects of ultrasonic energy and the characteristic microdimension. Ultrasonic energy parameters (such as the ultrasonic amplitude, frequency, and ultrasound velocity), the characteristic microdimension, and the molecular chain length (MCL) were introduced into the MU viscosity model. An ultrasonic micro-injection experimental platform was built on an injection molding machine. Polypropylene (PP) filling experiments were carried out using microgrooves with different flow length ratios (depth-to-width ratios of 3:1, 5:1, and 10:1). The validity and accuracy of the MU viscosity model were examined through a filling experiment with polypropylene (PP) microgroove injection molding and by a flow pressure difference experiment with polystyrene (PS). The results showed that the MU viscosity model was in better agreement with the experimental results compared to other models. The maximum error of the MU model was 4.9%. Ultrasound-assisted vibration had great effects on the filling capacity for microgrooves with high flow length ratios (depth-to-width ratios greater than 5:1). The filling capacity increased as the ultrasonic amplitude increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.