Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32121205›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Standardization of Plant Microbiome Studies: Which Proportion of the Microbiota is Really Harvested?

Abdoul Razack Sare, Gilles Stouvenakers, Mathilde Eck, Amber Lampens, Sofie Goormachtig, M Haïssam Jijakli, Sebastien Massart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdoul Razack SareLaboratory of Integrated and Urban Phytopathology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0941-1901
Gilles StouvenakersLaboratory of Integrated and Urban Phytopathology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.
Mathilde EckLaboratory of Integrated and Urban Phytopathology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.
Amber LampensVIB-UGent Center of Plant Systems Biology, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie GoormachtigVIB-UGent Center of Plant Systems Biology, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
M Haïssam JijakliLaboratory of Integrated and Urban Phytopathology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.
Sebastien MassartLaboratory of Integrated and Urban Phytopathology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS FIRA 5200818F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in plant-microbiome currently use diverse protocols, making their comparison difficult and biased. Research in human microbiome have faced similar challenges, but the scientific community proposed various recommendations which could also be applied to phytobiome studies. Here, we addressed the isolation of plant microbiota through apple carposphere and lettuce root microbiome. We demonstrated that the fraction of the culturable epiphytic microbiota harvested by a single wash might only represent one-third of the residing microbiota harvested after four successive washes. In addition, we observed important variability between the efficiency of washing protocols (up to 1.6-fold difference for apple and 1.9 for lettuce). QIIME2 analysis of 16S rRNA gene, showed a significant difference of the alpha and beta diversity between protocols in both cases. The abundance of 76 taxa was significantly different between protocols used for apple. In both cases, differences between protocols disappeared when sequences of the four washes were pooled. Hence, pooling the four successive washes increased the alpha diversity for apple in comparison to a single wash. These results underline the interest of repeated washing to leverage abundance of microbial cells harvested from plant epiphytic microbiota whatever the washing protocols, thus minimizing bias.

Indexed as

apple fruitbiasharvesting protocollettuce rootsplant microbiomestandardization

Identifiers

PMID32121205
PMCPMC7142977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.