ArticleMicroorganisms2020
Selenite Cystine Agar for Enumeration of Inoculated
Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Contamination and Combined Effects of Microplastic and Microbial Load on Water Quality and Public Health Risks in Industrial and Urban Canals of Coastal Bangladesh.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
- Rapid Quantification ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Copper Ion Treatment on Bacteria and Antibiotic Residues Contained in Bovine Waste Milk.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Microbial Profiling of Biltong Processing Using Culture-Dependent and Culture-Independent Microbiome Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Various Lactic Acid Bacteria and GenericMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Effect of Biltong Dried Beef Processing on the Reduction ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Quantification of Process Lethality (5-Log Reduction) ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Processing of Biltong (Dried Beef) to Achieve USDA-FSIS 5-log Reduction ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Process validation studies often require the inoculation of select foodborne pathogens into targeted foods to determine the lethality of the process or antimicrobial ingredients, and quantitative recovery of surviving inoculum bacteria helps to make those assessments. Such processes introduce various stressors on the inoculated challenge microorganisms whereby traditional selective media are too harsh to enumerate the remaining viable and injured population quantitatively. Innate antibiotic resistance of challenge organisms has often been used to establish simple selective media (i.e., Tryptic Soy Agar/TSA + antibiotics) for recovering inoculated strains, but sometimes antibiotic resistant background microorganisms are higher than desired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.