Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32121155›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2020

A Comprehensive Comparison of Bovine and Porcine Decellularized Pericardia: New Insights for Surgical Applications.

Sabra Zouhair, Eleonora Dal Sasso, Sugat R Tuladhar, Catia Fidalgo, Luca Vedovelli, Andrea Filippi, Giulia Borile, Andrea Bagno, Massimo Marchesan, De Rossi Giorgio and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tissue-engineered and autologous pericardium in congenital heart surgery: comparative histopathological study of human vascular explants.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabra ZouhairCardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
Eleonora Dal SassoCardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
Sugat R TuladharCardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
Catia FidalgoCardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
Luca VedovelliBiostatistics, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
Andrea FilippiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "G. Galilei," University of Padua, I-35131 Padua, Italy.
Giulia BorileDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "G. Galilei," University of Padua, I-35131 Padua, Italy.
Andrea BagnoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, I-35131 Padua, Italy.
Massimo MarchesanCardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
De Rossi GiorgioULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre, I-30174 Venice, Italy.
Dario GregoriBiostatistics, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
Willem F WolkersInstitute of Multiphase Processes, Leibniz Universität Hannover, D-30167 Hannover, Germany.
Filippo RomanatoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "G. Galilei," University of Padua, I-35131 Padua, Italy.
Sotirios KorossisDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Gino GerosaCardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
Laura IopCardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, I-35128 Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITLeibniz University Hannover · DELoughborough University · GB

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo Padua Heart ProjectFP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions 317512Regione del Veneto L.I.F.E.L.A.B. CORIS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenogeneic pericardium-based substitutes are employed for several surgical indications after chemical shielding, limiting their biocompatibility and therapeutic durability. Adverse responses to these replacements might be prevented by tissue decellularization, ideally removing cells and preserving the original extracellular matrix (ECM). The aim of this study was to compare the mostly applied pericardia in clinics, i.e. bovine and porcine tissues, after their decellularization, and obtain new insights for their possible surgical use. Bovine and porcine pericardia were submitted to TRICOL decellularization, based on osmotic shock, detergents and nuclease treatment. TRICOL procedure resulted in being effective in cell removal and preservation of ECM architecture of both species' scaffolds. Collagen and elastin were retained but glycosaminoglycans were reduced, significantly for bovine scaffolds. Tissue hydration was varied by decellularization, with a rise for bovine pericardia and a decrease for porcine ones. TRICOL significantly increased porcine pericardial thickness, while a non-significant reduction was observed for the bovine counterpart. The protein secondary structure and thermal denaturation profile of both species' scaffolds were unaltered. Both pericardial tissues showed augmented biomechanical compliance after decellularization. The ECM bioactivity of bovine and porcine pericardia was unaffected by decellularization, sustaining viability and proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells. In conclusion, decellularized bovine and porcine pericardia demonstrate possessing the characteristics that are suitable for the creation of novel scaffolds for reconstruction or replacement: differences in water content, thickness and glycosaminoglycans might influence some of their biomechanical properties and, hence, their indication for surgical use.

Indexed as

Materials TestingAnimalsCattleCollagenElastinExtracellular MatrixHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsPericardiumSpecies SpecificitySwineCollagenElastinbovine pericardiumdecellularizationporcine pericardiumsurgerysurgical replacementstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32121155
PMCPMC7175169
OpenAlexW3010560585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.