Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32121145›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Food Reward and Food Choice. An Inquiry Through The Liking and Wanting Model.

Almudena Recio-Román, Manuel Recio-Menéndez, María Victoria Román-González

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Almudena Recio-RománTilburg University, Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 9 9.14, 5037 DA Tilburg, Brabant, The Netherlands.
Manuel Recio-MenéndezDepartament of Economy and Business, University of Almería, Carretera de Sacramento s.n., 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7052-6225
María Victoria Román-GonzálezDepartament of Economy and Business, University of Almería, Carretera de Sacramento s.n., 04120 Almería, Spain.
University of Almería · ESTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What if consumers are getting obese because eating less calories is more difficult for persons that have a higher pleasure and desire towards food (Ikeda et al., 2005) and food companies do not help given only a two extreme option choice to satisfy their needs (i.e., low calories vs. high calories or healthy vs. unhealthy)? Reward systems are being described with a new conceptual approach where liking-the pleasure derived from eating a given food-and wanting-motivational value, desire, or craving-can be seen as the significant forces guiding eating behavior. Our work shows that pleasure (liking), desire (wanting), and the interaction between them influence and are good predictors of food choice and food intake. Reward responses to food are closely linked to food choice, inducing to caloric overconsumption. Based on the responses given to a self-administered questionnaire measuring liking and wanting attitudes, we found three different segments named 'Reward lovers,' 'Half epicurious,' and 'Non indulgents'. Their behavior when choosing food is quite different. Results show differential effects on caloric consumption depending on segments. The introduction of more food choices that try to balance their content is a win-win strategy for consumers, companies, and society.

Indexed as

FoodFood PreferencesModels, TheoreticalRewardFemaleHumansMaleRegression AnalysisReproducibility of Resultsbundlesconsumer choicefood choicefood rewardhealthliking-wantingobesityself-controltastevariety-seeking

Identifiers

PMID32121145
PMCPMC7146242
OpenAlexW3008220837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.