ArticleViruses2020
Genotyping
Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond labels: current sequencing data do not support standardized porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) genotypes.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Analysis of Selected Viral Pathogens in Wild Boar Populations of Russia.Viruses · 2026Article
- Epidemiological Survey of Porcine Circovirus Types 2 and 3 in Liaoning Region of China and Preparation of Monoclonal Antibodies Against PCV3 Cap Protein.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Detection of PCV3 in various sample types from wild boars in Poland.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Emergence of a Novel CRESS-DNA Virus Associated with Swine Reproductive Failure in China.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Evidence of Spillover and Recombination Between Domestic Pigs and Wild Boars Provides New Insights into Porcine Circoviruses.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetic Characterization and Evidence of Capsid Epitope Variation in Porcine Circovirus Type 3 Strains from Vietnamese Swine with Reproductive Disorders.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Prevalence and genetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) in Henan Province of China during 2022-2024.Archives of virology · 2025Article
- Review
- Detection of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 in Free-Ranging Wild Boars and Ticks in Jiangsu Province, China.Viruses · 2025Article
- Molecular epidemiology and genetic characterization of PCV2 and PCV3 circulating in domestic pigs and wild boars in central-southern regions of Italy.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Rescue of naïve porcine circovirus type 3 and its pathogenesis in CD pigs.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Article
- Phylodynamic reconstruction of major chicken infectious anemia virus clades epidemiology, dispersal, and evolution.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Investigating the Presence and Genetic Variability of Porcine Circovirus Types 2 and 3 in Live Markets in Border Cities of Northeast China.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Review
- The Australian Biosecurity Genomic Database: a new resource for high-throughput sequencing analysis based on the National Notifiable Disease List of Terrestrial Animals.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- First detection of PCV4 in swine in the United States: codetection with PCV2 and PCV3 and direct detection within tissues.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Porcine Circovirus Type 3 (PCV3) in Poland: Prevalence in Wild Boar Population in Connection with African Swine Fever (ASF).Viruses · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of a globally distributed porcine circovirus (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.