Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32121063›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Management Recommendations for Merkel Cell Carcinoma-A Danish Perspective.

Simon Naseri, Torben Steiniche, Morten Ladekarl, Marie Louise Bønnelykke-Behrndtz, Lisbet R Hölmich, Seppo W Langer, Alessandro Venzo, Elizaveta Tabaksblat, Siri Klausen, Mathilde Skaarup Larsen and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The role of radiotherapy in the updated German S2k guideline for management of Merkel cell carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Merkel Cell Carcinoma from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon NaseriDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Torben SteinicheDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten LadekarlDepartment of Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Marie Louise Bønnelykke-BehrndtzDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Lisbet R HölmichDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital, Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Seppo W LangerDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alessandro VenzoDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elizaveta TabaksblatDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Siri KlausenDepartment of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Mathilde Skaarup LarsenDepartment of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Niels JunkerDepartment of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Annette H ChakeraDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital, Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare malignant neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin with a poor prognosis and an apparent increase in incidence. Due to its rarity, evidence-based guidelines are limited, and there is a lack of awareness among clinicians. This review constitutes the consensus management recommendations developed by the Danish MCC expert group and is based on a systematic literature search. Patients with localized disease are recommended surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy to the primary site; however, this may be omitted in patients with MCC with low risk features. Patients with regional lymph node involvement are recommended complete lymph node removal and adjuvant radiotherapy in case of extracapsular disease. Metastatic disease was traditionally treated with chemotherapy, however, recent clinical trials with immune therapy have been promising. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) axis should therefore be strongly considered as first-line treatment for fit patients. A 5-year follow-up period is recommended involving clinical exam every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months for the following 3 years and PET-CT one to two times a year or if clinically indicated. These national recommendations are intended to offer uniform patient treatment and hopefully improve prognosis.

Indexed as

diagnosisguidelineMerkel cell carcinomareviewtreatment

Identifiers

PMID32121063
PMCPMC7139291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.