Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32121040›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

External Validation of the '

Claudio Di Lorito, Alessandro Bosco, Kristian Pollock, Rowan H Harwood, Roshan das Nair, Pip Logan, Sarah Goldberg, Vicky Booth, Kavita Vedhara, Maureen Godfrey and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tele-Rehabilitation for People with Dementia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case-Study from England.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudio Di LoritoDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Alessandro BoscoDivision of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Institute of Mental Health, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Rowan H HarwoodSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Roshan das NairDivision of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Institute of Mental Health, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8143-7893
Pip LoganDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Sarah GoldbergSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Vicky BoothDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Kavita VedharaDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Room 1305 Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Maureen GodfreyDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Marianne DunlopDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Veronika van der WardtWissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin, Zentrum für Methodenwissenschaften und Gesundheitsforschung Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Präventive und Rehabilitative Medizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35032 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-7056
University of Nottingham · GBPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0614-20007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity is beneficial for people with dementia. We previously developed a theoretical model to explain behaviour change in physical activity in dementia (PHYT-in-dementia). This study aimed to externally validate the model. Validation occurred through the process evaluation of a programme promoting activity in people with dementia (PrAISED 2). Twenty participants with dementia and their carers were interviewed to investigate their experience of the programme. The data were analysed through content analysis. The original constructs of the model were used as initial codes and new codes were generated, if elicited from the data. The constructs were also ranked, based on their frequency in the interviews. All of the original model constructs were validated and two novel constructs created:

Indexed as

ExerciseCaregiversDementiaHealth PromotionHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalMotivationProgram Evaluationbehaviour changedementiaexerciseexternal validationphysical activitytheory

Identifiers

PMID32121040
PMCPMC7084200
OpenAlexW3006737324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.