Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32120988›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Proinflammatory Effect of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials: In Vitro Study on Stimulation of Inflammasome NLRP3 via Destabilisation of Lysosomes.

Tereza Svadlakova, Frantisek Hubatka, Pavlina Turanek Knotigova, Pavel Kulich, Josef Masek, Jan Kotoucek, Jan Macak, Martin Motola, Martin Kalbac, Martina Kolackova and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Immunoassay-mass spectrometry to identifyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Immunotoxicity of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials, Starring Phagocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Tereza SvadlakovaInstitute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Frantisek HubatkaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavlina Turanek KnotigovaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavel KulichVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Josef MasekVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan KotoucekVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan MacakCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, 53002 Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Martin MotolaCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, 53002 Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Martin KalbacJ. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 18223 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martina KolackovaInstitute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Radka VankovaInstitute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Petra VicherkovaInstitute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Andrea MalkovaInstitute of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Pavlina SimeckovaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Yuri VolkovDepartment of Clinical Medicine/Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Trinity College Dublin, D08 W9RT, Dublin, Ireland.
Adriele Prina-MelloDepartment of Clinical Medicine/Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Trinity College Dublin, D08 W9RT, Dublin, Ireland.
Irena KratochvilovaInstitute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 18200 Prague, Czech Republic.
Zdenek FialaInstitute of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Milan RaskaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan KrejsekInstitute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav TuranekVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Veterinary Research Institute · CZCharles University · CZUniversity of Pardubice · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry · CZSechenov University · RUTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Charles University PROGRES Q40/09Charles University PROGRES Q40/10Grantová Agentura České Republiky GAP503/12/G147Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic MZE-RO0518Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic LM2015088Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000495Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001821Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001829Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000760Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon-based nanomaterials (C-BNM) have recently attracted an increased attention as the materials with potential applications in industry and medicine. Bioresistance and proinflammatory potential of C-BNM is the main obstacle for their medicinal application which was documented in vivo and in vitro. However, there are still limited data especially on graphene derivatives such as graphene platelets (GP). In this work, we compared multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and two different types of pristine GP in their potential to activate inflammasome NLRP3 (The nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3) in vitro. Our study is focused on exposure of THP-1/THP1-null cells and peripheral blood monocytes to C-BNM as representative models of canonical and alternative pathways, respectively. Although all nanomaterials were extensively accumulated in the cytoplasm, increasing doses of all C-BNM did not lead to cell death. We observed direct activation of NLRP3 via destabilization of lysosomes and release of cathepsin B into cytoplasm only in the case of MWCNTs. Direct activation of NLRP3 by both GP was statistically insignificant but could be induced by synergic action with muramyl dipeptide (MDP), as a representative molecule of the family of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). This study demonstrates a possible proinflammatory potential of GP and MWCNT acting through NLRP3 activation.

Indexed as

carbon nanotubescathepsin Bgraphene plateletsinflammasome NLRP3macrophagesTHP-1

Identifiers

PMID32120988
PMCPMC7152843
OpenAlexW3007280959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.