Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32120862›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration in a Silicone Rubber Conduit in Taxol-Treated Rats.

Chien-Fu Liao, Shih-Tien Hsu, Chung-Chia Chen, Chun-Hsu Yao, Jia-Horng Lin, Yung-Hsiang Chen, Yueh-Sheng Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mechanism of Action of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chien-Fu LiaoDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Shih-Tien HsuDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Chung-Chia ChenLinsen Chinese Medicine and Kunming Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei 10341, Taiwan.
Chun-Hsu YaoDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Jia-Horng LinDepartment of Fiber and Composite Materials, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan.
Yung-Hsiang ChenDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Yueh-Sheng ChenDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Asia University · TWChina Medical University · TWFeng Chia University · TWTaipei City Hospital · TW

Funding

China Medical University, Taiwan CMU107-S-54Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST108-2314-B-039-045Taichung Veterans General Hospital TCVGH-1086402BTaipei City Hospital TPCH-107-061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxol, a type of antimitotic agent, could modulate local inflammatory conditions in peripheral nerves, which may impair their regeneration and recovery when injured. This study provided in vivo trials of silicone rubber chambers to bridge a long 10 mm sciatic nerve defect in taxol-treated rats. It was aimed to determine the effects of electrical stimulation at various frequencies on regeneration of the sciatic nerves in the bridging conduits. Taxol-treated rats were divided into four groups (n = 10/group): sham control (no current delivered from the stimulator); and electrical stimulation (3 times/week for 3 weeks at 2, 20, and 200 Hz with 1 mA current intensity). Neuronal electrophysiology, animal behavior, neuronal connectivity, macrophage infiltration, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) expression levels, and morphological observations were evaluated. At the end of 4 weeks, animals in the low- (2 Hz) and medium-frequency (20 Hz) groups had dramatic higher rates of successful regeneration (90% and 80%) across the wide gap as compared to the groups of sham and high-frequency (200 Hz) (60% and 50%). In addition, the 2 Hz group had significantly larger amplitudes and evoked muscle action potentials compared to the sham and the 200 Hz group, respectively (P < 0.05). Heat, cold plate licking latencies, motor coordination, and neuronal connectivity were unaffected by the electrical stimulation. Macrophage density, CGRP expression level, and axon number were all significantly increased in the 20 Hz group compared to the sham group (P < 0.05). This study suggested that low- (2 Hz) to medium-frequency (20 Hz) electrical stimulation could ameliorate local inflammatory conditions to augment recovery of regenerating nerves by accelerating their regrowth and improving electrophysiological function in taxol-treated peripheral nerve injury repaired with the silicone rubber conduit.

Indexed as

electrical stimulationmacrophageperipheral nerve regenerationsilicone rubbertaxol

Identifiers

PMID32120862
PMCPMC7084817
OpenAlexW3008492907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.