ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2020
The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction.
Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of the pipeline embolization device placement on branching vessels in anterior circulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Defining biomaterial-driven design principles for bioabsorbable flow diverters: current state and perspectives.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Twelve-Month Outcomes of the J-Tube Flow-Diverting Stent for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: a Prospective Multicenter Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Effect of coiling on aneurysm neck hemorheology in flow diverter stent-assisted treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- The value of non-contrast and contrast-enhanced time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up assessment of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Millisecond magnetic particle imaging of a cerebral aneurysm phantom with and without flow diverter stent.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Multicenter study of the safety and effectiveness of intracranial aneurysm treatment with the p64MW-HPC flow modulation device.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- First clinical experience with the surpass elite flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Comaneci stent-angioplasty for the optimization of inadequately deployed flow diverter stents.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- X-configuration Pipeline Flex embolization device for complex anterior communicating artery aneurysm: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Flow Diverting Stents for the Treatment of Complex Visceral and Renal Aneurysms-A Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy of flow diverter stents in the treatment of bifurcation cerebral aneurysms: single-center experienceDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- Flow-Diverting Stents During Mechanical Thrombectomy for Carotid Artery Dissection-Related Stroke: Analysis from a Multicentre Cohort.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Lattice Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Flow Diverter Devices in the Treatment of Carotid Sidewall Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective, Multicenter Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Flow Diverter Performance Comparison of Different Wire Materials for Effective Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Emergent salvage of the vertebral artery with flow diverter pipeline stent following vessel laceration: Systematic literature review and illustrative case example.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Traumatic carotid artery injury caused by a metal sipping straw in a pediatric patient: Anesthetic management and considerations.Trauma case reports · 2023Article
- Microsurgical strategies for small unruptured dorsal internal carotid artery aneurysms.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Engineering Analysis of Non-Braided Polycaprolactone Bioresorbable Flow Diverters for Aneurysms.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15-25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In 2011, the first FDS approved for use in the United States market. Shortly thereafter, the Pipeline of Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) study was published demonstrating high efficacy and a similar complication profile to other intracranial stents. The initial FDA instructions for use (IFU) limited its use to patients 22 years old or older with wide-necked large or giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the petrous segment to superior hypophyseal artery/ophthalmic segment. Expanded IFU was tested in the Prospective Study on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms with PipelineTM Embolization Device (PREMIER) trial. With further post-approval clinical data, the United States FDA expanded the IFU to include patients with small or medium, wide-necked saccular or fusiform aneurysms from the petrous ICA to the ICA terminus. However, IFU is more restrictive in South Korea than in United States. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the overall efficacy of FDS for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and consistently identify FDS as an effective technique for the treatment of aneurysms broadly with complication rates similar to other traditional techniques. A growing body of literature has demonstrated high efficacy of FDS for small aneurysms; distal artery aneurysms; non-saccular aneurysms posterior circulation aneurysms and complication rates similar to traditional techniques. In the short interval since the Pipeline Embolization Device was first introduced, FDS has been firmly entrenched as a powerful tool in the endovascular armamentarium. As new FDS are developed, established FDS are refined, and delivery systems are improved the uses for FDS will only expand further. Researchers continue to work to optimize the mechanical characteristics of the FDS themselves, aiming to optimize deploy ability and efficacy. With expanded use for small to medium aneurysms and posterior circulation aneurysms, FDS technology is firmly entrenched as a powerful tool to treat challenging aneurysms, both primarily and as an adjunct to coil embolization. With the aforementioned advances, the ease of FDS deployment will improve and complication rates will be further minimized. This will only further establish FDS deployment as a key strategy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.