Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32120136›Full record

ReviewMutation research

Targeting AKT/PKB to improve treatment outcomes for solid tumors.

M Iida, P M Harari, D L Wheeler, M Toulany

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Meningiomas in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: A case report and comprehensive review.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Essential Oil fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M IidaDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin in Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: iida@humonc.wisc.edu.
P M HarariDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin in Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
D L WheelerDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin in Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
M ToulanyDivision of Radiobiology and Molecular Environmental Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tuebingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: mahmoud.toulany@uni-tuebingen.de.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Project 4: Role of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase AXL in HNSCC Therapy ResistanceP50DE026787 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI YU, MENGGANG · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE026787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The serine/threonine kinase AKT, also known as protein kinase B (PKB), is the major substrate to phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and consists of three paralogs: AKT1 (PKBα), AKT2 (PKBβ) and AKT3 (PKBγ). The PI3K/AKT pathway is normally activated by binding of ligands to membrane-bound receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) as well as downstream to G-protein coupled receptors and integrin-linked kinase. Through multiple downstream substrates, activated AKT controls a wide variety of cellular functions including cell proliferation, survival, metabolism, and angiogenesis in both normal and malignant cells. In human cancers, the PI3K/AKT pathway is most frequently hyperactivated due to mutations and/or overexpression of upstream components. Aberrant expression of RTKs, gain of function mutations in PIK3CA, RAS, PDPK1, and AKT itself, as well as loss of function mutation in AKT phosphatases are genetic lesions that confer hyperactivation of AKT. Activated AKT stimulates DNA repair, e.g. double strand break repair after radiotherapy. Likewise, AKT attenuates chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. These observations suggest that a crucial link exists between AKT and DNA damage. Thus, AKT could be a major predictive marker of conventional cancer therapy, molecularly targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for solid tumors. In this review, we summarize the current understanding by which activated AKT mediates resistance to cancer treatment modalities, i.e. radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and RTK targeted therapy. Next, the effect of AKT on response of tumor cells to RTK targeted strategies will be discussed. Finally, we will provide a brief summary on the clinical trials of AKT inhibitors in combination with radiochemotherapy, RTK targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Protein KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDNA DamageDNA, NeoplasmDNA RepairGamma RaysHumansIsoenzymesMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktras Proteins3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Protein KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsDNA, NeoplasmIsoenzymesPDPK1 protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktras ProteinsAKT/PKBDNA repairMolecular targetingRadiochemotherapyReceptor tyrosine kinasesSolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID32120136
PMCPMC7169978
OpenAlexW3008053760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.