Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119841›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2020

Development and validation of a simplified score to predict neonatal mortality risk among neonates weighing 2000 g or less (NMR-2000): an analysis using data from the UK and The Gambia.

Melissa M Medvedev, Helen Brotherton, Abdou Gai, Cally Tann, Christopher Gale, Peter Waiswa, Diana Elbourne, Joy E Lawn, Elizabeth Allen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Melissa M MedvedevDepartment of Paediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: melissa.morgan@lshtm.ac.uk.
Helen BrothertonMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; UK Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Abdou GaiUK Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Cally TannMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Neonatal Medicine, University College London, London, UK; Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Christopher GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Peter WaiswaCentre of Excellence for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Diana ElbourneDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Joy E LawnMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Elizabeth AllenDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBImperial College London · GBMakerere University · UGMedical Research Council · GBMRC Unit the Gambia · GMUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The OMWaNA Study: Operationalizing kangaroo Mother care among clinically unstable low birth Weight Neonates in AfricaK23HD092611 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MEDVEDEV, MELISSA MORGAN · 2018 to 2023
$948k
Medical Research Council MR/N008405/1Medical Research Council MR/S004971/1NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD092611Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 2000116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background78% of neonatal deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia, among which, more than 80% are in low birthweight babies. Existing neonatal mortality risk scores have primarily been developed for high-resource settings. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a score that is practicable for low-income and middle-income countries to predict in-hospital mortality among neonates born weighing 2000 g or less using datasets from the UK and The Gambia.

methodsThis analysis used retrospective data held in the UK National Neonatal Research Database from 187 neonatal units, and data from the Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital (EFSTH), Banjul, The Gambia. In the UK dataset, neonates were excluded if birthweight was more than 2000 g; if the neonate was admitted aged more than 6 h or following discharge; if the neonate was stillborn; if the neonate died in delivery room; or if they were moribund on admission. The Gambian dataset included all neonates weighing less than 2000 g who were admitted between May 1, 2018, and Sept 30, 2019, who were screened for but not enrolled in the Early Kangaroo Mother Care Trial. 18 studies were reviewed to generate a list of 84 potential parameters. We derived a model to score in-hospital neonatal mortality risk using data from 55 029 admissions to a random sample of neonatal units in England and Wales from Jan 1, 2010, to Dec 31, 2016. All candidate variables were included in a complete multivariable model, which was progressively simplified using reverse stepwise selection. We validated the new score (NMR-2000) on 40 329 admissions to the remaining units between the same dates and 14 818 admissions to all units from Jan 1, to Dec 31, 2017. We also validated the score on 550 neonates admitted to the EFSTH in The Gambia.

findings18 candidate variables were selected for inclusion in the modelling process. The final model included three parameters: birthweight, admission oxygen saturation, and highest level of respiratory support within 24 h of birth. NMR-2000 had very good discrimination and goodness-of-fit across the UK samples, with a c-index of 0·8859-0·8930 and a Brier score of 0·0232-0·0271. Among Gambian neonates, the model had a c-index of 0·8170 and a Brier score of 0·1688. Predictive ability of the simplified integer score was similar to the model using regression coefficients, with c-indices of 0·8903 in the UK full validation sample and 0·8082 in the Gambian validation sample.

interpretationNMR-2000 is a validated mortality risk score for hospitalised neonates weighing 2000 g or less in settings where pulse oximetry is available. The score is accurate and simplified for bedside use. NMR-2000 requires further validation using a larger dataset from low-income and middle-income countries but has the potential to improve individual and population-level neonatal care resource allocation.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development; Wellcome Trust; and Joint Global Health Trials scheme of Department of Health and Social Care, Department for International Development, Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolFemaleGambiaHospital MortalityHumansIncomeInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesKangaroo-Mother Care MethodMaleOximetryPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32119841
PMCPMC7083247
OpenAlexW3007589862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.