Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119763›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2020

Efficacy of topical silicone gel in scar management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Fan Wang, Xiaoxue Li, Xiuyun Wang, Xian Jiang

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Practice guideline for adult burn rehabilitation nursing (2026 edition)].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effectiveness of different non-surgical scar reduction methods in post-operative scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars Treatment.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. [Research advances on pharmacological interventions for hypertrophic scar].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fan WangDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoxue LiDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiuyun WangDepartment of Abdominal Cancer, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xian JiangDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of topical silicone gel in the management of scars, we conducted this meta-analysis. The systematic search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, and six randomised controlled trials with a total of 375 patients were involved. The outcome data of Vancouver Scar Scale were extracted from the studies and their effect sizes were calculated using Review Manager 5.3. As a result, topical silicone gel significantly reduced pigmentation, height, and pliability scores postoperatively compared with placebos or no treatment (Pigmentation: standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.55 [-0.83 to -0.26], P = .0002; Height: SMD = -0.73 [-1.02 to -0.44], P < .00001; Pliability: SMD = -0.49 [-0.95 to -0.03], P = .04). Topical silicone gel and silicone gel sheet were comparably effective (P > .05). The performance of topical silicone gel and other non-silicone topical treatment was also similar (P > .05). In summary, topical silicone gel was effective in post-operative scar prevention.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalCicatrixGelsHumansSilicone GelsGelsSilicone Gelspreventionscarsilicone geltopical therapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID32119763
PMCPMC7949016
OpenAlexW3009584875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.