Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119744›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2020

The Nutritional Composition and Energy Content of Donor Human Milk: A Systematic Review.

Maryanne T Perrin, Mandy B Belfort, James I Hagadorn, Jacqueline M McGrath, Sarah N Taylor, Lauren M Tosi, Elizabeth A Brownell

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Macronutrient and bioactive profiles of donor milk differ in commercial vs non-profit milk banks.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Osmolality of fortified human milk with contemporary human milk fortifiers.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maryanne T PerrinDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Mandy B BelfortDepartment of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
James I HagadornConnecticut Human Milk Research Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Division of Neonatology, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, CT, USA.
Jacqueline M McGrathSchool of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Sarah N TaylorDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lauren M TosiConnecticut Human Milk Research Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Division of Neonatology, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, CT, USA.
Elizabeth A BrownellConnecticut Human Milk Research Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Division of Neonatology, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, CT, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends donor human milk (DHM) as the preferred feeding strategy for preterm infants when the milk of the mother is unavailable, based on conclusive evidence of lower rates of necrotizing enterocolitis with DHM feedings compared with preterm infant formula. The nutritional composition of DHM may differ from maternal milk for many reasons including differences in maternal characteristics, milk collection methods, and the impact of donor milk banking practices. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the literature regarding research on the fat, protein, carbohydrate, vitamin, and mineral composition of DHM obtained through nonprofit milk banks or commercial entities. PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published between 1985 and 30 April, 2019. In total, 164 abstracts were screened independently by 2 investigators, and 14 studies met all inclusion criteria. Studies were predominantly small (<50 samples) and measured macronutrients. Few studies assessed vitamins and minerals. Information bias was prevalent due to the use of a variety of analytical methods which influence accuracy and cross-study comparisons. Other sources of information bias included missing information regarding methods for protein and calorie assessment. Despite these limitations, existing research suggests the potential for 2-fold and greater differences in the fat, protein, and energy composition of DHM, with mean values for energy and fat often below clinical reference values expected for human milk. Further research is warranted regarding the nutritional composition of DHM, with a prioritization on measuring macronutrients and micronutrients using established reference methods.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingMilk BanksAnimalsChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMilk, Humanbreastmilkcompositiondonor milkhuman milkmilk bankingpreterm

Identifiers

PMID32119744
PMCPMC7360450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.