Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119676›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Construction and content validation of a measurement tool to evaluate person-centered therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy services.

O Rodríguez Nogueira, J Botella-Rico, M C Martínez González, M Leal Clavel, J Morera-Balaguer, A R Moreno-Poyato

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Content Validity of a Scale Designed to Measure the Access of Older Adults to Outpatient Health Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

O Rodríguez NogueiraUniversity of León, Health Sciences School, Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Ponferrada León, Spain.
J Botella-RicoUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Physical Therapy Department, Plaza Reyes Católicos, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
M C Martínez GonzálezUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Medicine Department, Plaza Reyes Católicos, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
M Leal ClavelUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Nursing Department, Plaza Reyes Católicos, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
J Morera-BalaguerUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Physical Therapy Department, Plaza Reyes Católicos, Elche, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8733-4406
A R Moreno-PoyatoUniversitat de Barcelona, Escola d'Infermeria, Departament d'Infermeria de Salut Pública, Salut Mental i MaternoInfantil, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Campus Bellvitge Pavelló de Govern, c/ Feixa Llarga, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5700-4315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study sought to develop a tool for evaluating person-centered therapeutic relationships within physiotherapy services, and to examine the content validity of the same.

methodsA mixed qualitative and quantitative study was performed in three distinct phases: 1) the items were generated based on a literature review and a content analysis of focus groups of patients and physiotherapists; 2) an e-Delphi survey process was performed based on three rounds to select and refine the proposed questionnaire; 3) two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted to evaluate the comprehension of items, the clarity of language and the appropriateness and relevance of content.

resultsThirty-one items were generated based on the seven domains identified after the analysis of four focus groups of physiotherapists and four patient focus groups. Nine experts participated in the e-Delphi survey. Fifty-five patients participated in the two rounds of the cognitive pre-tests. Participating patients were from public and private physical therapy services. Based on the participants' suggestions, four items were removed, and four were added, whereas 16 were reworded.

conclusionsThe final tool comprised 31 items divided into seven domains. The response format was based on a 5-point Likert frequency scale. The response options ranged from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree".

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy SpecialtySurveys and QuestionnairesTherapeutic Alliance

Identifiers

PMID32119676
PMCPMC7051061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.