Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119666›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Projecting the future of dengue under climate change scenarios: Progress, uncertainties and research needs.

Zhiwei Xu, Hilary Bambrick, Francesca D Frentiu, Gregor Devine, Laith Yakob, Gail Williams, Wenbiao Hu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Climate warming is expanding dengue burden in the Americas and Asia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Climate warming is expanding dengue burden in the Americas and Asia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Dengue.Lancet (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhiwei XuSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Hilary BambrickSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Francesca D FrentiuSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8628-4216
Gregor DevineMosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Laith YakobDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8639-4511
Gail WilliamsSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Wenbiao HuSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-9240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue is a mosquito-borne viral disease and its transmission is closely linked to climate. We aimed to review available information on the projection of dengue in the future under climate change scenarios.

methodsUsing five databases (PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science), a systematic review was conducted to retrieve all articles from database inception to 30th June 2019 which projected the future of dengue under climate change scenarios. In this review, "the future of dengue" refers to disease burden of dengue, epidemic potential of dengue cases, geographical distribution of dengue cases, and population exposed to climatically suitable areas of dengue.

resultsSixteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and five of them projected a global dengue future. Most studies reported an increase in disease burden, a wider spatial distribution of dengue cases or more people exposed to climatically suitable areas of dengue as climate change proceeds. The years 1961-1990 and 2050 were the most commonly used baseline and projection periods, respectively. Multiple climate change scenarios introduced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), including B1, A1B, and A2, as well as Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6 (RCP2.6), RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5, were most widely employed. Instead of projecting the future number of dengue cases, there is a growing consensus on using "population exposed to climatically suitable areas for dengue" or "epidemic potential of dengue cases" as the outcome variable. Future studies exploring non-climatic drivers which determine the presence/absence of dengue vectors, and identifying the pivotal factors triggering the transmission of dengue in those climatically suitable areas would help yield a more accurate projection for dengue in the future.

conclusionsProjecting the future of dengue requires a systematic consideration of assumptions and uncertainties, which will facilitate the development of tailored climate change adaptation strategies to manage dengue.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDisease Transmission, InfectiousEnvironmental ExposureCost of IllnessDengueHumansIncidenceMosquito VectorsPrevalenceTopography, Medical

Identifiers

PMID32119666
PMCPMC7067491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.