Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119546›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020

Determination of Protein Structural Ensembles by Hybrid-Resolution SAXS Restrained Molecular Dynamics.

Cristina Paissoni, Alexander Jussupow, Carlo Camilloni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-Physics-Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Automatic Bayesian Weighting for SAXS Data.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina PaissoniDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Alexander JussupowDepartment of Chemistry and Institute of Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Garching 85747, Germany.
Carlo CamilloniDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9923-8590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments provide low-resolution but valuable information about the dynamics of biomolecular systems, which could be ideally integrated into molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to accurately determine conformational ensembles of flexible proteins. The applicability of this strategy is hampered by the high computational cost required to calculate scattering intensities from three-dimensional structures. We previously presented a hybrid resolution method that makes atomistic SAXS-restrained MD simulation feasible by adopting a coarse-grained approach to efficiently back-calculate scattering intensities; here, we extend this technique, applying it in the framework of metainference with the aim to investigate the dynamical behavior of flexible biomolecules. The efficacy of the method is assessed on the K63-diubiquitin, showing that the inclusion of SAXS restraints is effective in generating a reliable conformational ensemble, improving the agreement with independent experimental data.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationScattering, Small AngleX-Ray DiffractionProtein ConformationUbiquitinsUbiquitins

Identifiers

PMID32119546
PMCPMC7997378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.