Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119096›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Effect of Pregnenolone vs Placebo on Self-reported Chronic Low Back Pain Among US Military Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jennifer C Naylor, Jason D Kilts, Lawrence J Shampine, Gillian J Parke, H Ryan Wagner, Steven T Szabo, Karen D Smith, Trina B Allen, Emily G Telford-Marx, Charlotte E Dunn and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01898013 (Neurosteroids as Novel Therapeutic Agents for Chronic Pain in OEF/OIF Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01898013 phase2completednot on this map

Neurosteroids as Novel Therapeutic Agents for Chronic Pain in OEF/OIF Veterans

TypeinterventionalSponsorDurham VA Medical CenterRan2013 to 2017Enrolled94ConditionsLower Back PainArmsPregnenolone, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Novel neurosteroid therapeutics for post-partum depression: perspectives on clinical trials, program development, active research, and future directions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer C NaylorDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Jason D KiltsDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Lawrence J ShampineDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Gillian J ParkeDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
H Ryan WagnerDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Steven T SzaboDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Karen D SmithDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Trina B AllenDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Emily G Telford-MarxDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Charlotte E DunnDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Brian T CuffeDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Susan H O'LoughlinDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Christine E MarxDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Durham VA Health Care System · USDuke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In response to the national opioid public health crisis, there is an urgent need to develop nonopioid solutions for effective pain management. Neurosteroids are endogenous molecules with pleotropic actions that show promise for safe and effective treatment of chronic low back pain. Objective: To determine whether adjunctive pregnenolone has therapeutic utility for the treatment of chronic low back pain in Iraq- and Afghanistan-era US military veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that enrolled for 42 months, from September 2013 to April 2017. Participants were Iraq- and Afghanistan-era veterans aged 18 to 65 years with chronic low back pain who received treatment in the Durham VA Health Care System in Durham, North Carolina, over 6 weeks. Data analysis began in 2018 and was finalized in March, 2019. Interventions: Following a 1-week placebo lead-in, participants were randomized to pregnenolone or placebo for 4 weeks. Pregnenolone and placebo were administered at fixed, escalating doses of 100 mg for 1 week, 300 mg for 1 week, and 500 mg for 2 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the change in mean pain intensity ratings from a daily pain diary (numerical rating scale, 0-10) between visit 3 (baseline) and visit 6. Secondary outcomes included pain interference scores (Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form). Preintervention and postintervention neurosteroid levels were quantified by gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Hypotheses tested were formulated prior to data collection. Results: A total of 94 participants (84 [89.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 37.5 [9.8] years; 53 [56.4%] of self-reported Caucasian race and 31 [33.0%] of self-reported African American race) were included. Forty-eight participants were randomized to pregnenolone and 52 to placebo, of whom 45 and 49, respectively, were included in baseline demographic characteristics secondary to noncompliance with medications as per protocol. Veterans randomized to pregnenolone reported significant reductions in low back pain relative to those randomized to placebo. Baseline unadjusted mean (SE) pain diary ratings were 4.83 (0.23) and 5.24 (0.22) for the placebo- and pregnenolone-treated groups, respectively (baseline unadjusted mean [SE] ratings for pain recall were 4.78 [0.24] and 5.15 [0.23], respectively). Unadjusted mean (SE) ratings following treatment (visit 6) were 4.74 (0.26) in the placebo group and 4.19 (0.30) in the pregnenolone-treated group. Unadjusted mean (SE) ratings for pain recall following treatment were 4.86 (0.27) for placebo and 4.18 (0.29) for pregnenolone. Least-square mean (LSM) analysis showed that pain scores significantly improved in the pregnenolone-treated group compared with placebo (LSM [SE] change in pain diary rating, -0.56 [0.25]; P = .02; LSM [SE] change in pain recall, -0.70 [0.27]; P = .01). Pain interference scores for work (LSM [SE] change, 0.71 [0.12]; P = .04) and activity (LSM [SE] change, 0.71 [0.11]; P = .03) were also improved in veterans randomized to pregnenolone compared with placebo. Pregnenolone was well tolerated. Conclusions and Relevance: Participants receiving pregnenolone reported a clinically meaningful reduction in low back pain and 2 pain interference domains compared with those receiving placebo. Pregnenolone may represent a novel, safe, and potentially efficacious treatment for the alleviation of chronic low back pain in Iraq- and Afghanistan-era veterans. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898013.

Indexed as

VeteransAdultAfghan Campaign 2001-Chronic PainDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansIraq War, 2003-2011Least-Squares AnalysisLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPregnanolonePregnenolonePregnanolonePregnenolone

Identifiers

PMID32119096
PMCPMC7052727
OpenAlexW3009384353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.