Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32119028›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2020

Association of QT-Prolonging Medications With Risk of Autopsy-Defined Causes of Sudden Death.

Timothy F Simpson, James W Salazar, Eric Vittinghoff, Joanne Probert, Alan Iwahashi, Jeffrey E Olgin, Phillip Ursell, Amy Hart, Ellen Moffatt, Zian H Tseng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Ventricular arrhythmias in acute heart failure: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Exercises in Clinical Reasoning: Beyond the Surface.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Arrhythmic safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients from different clinical settings.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 - A narrative review.The Indian journal of tuberculosis · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy F SimpsonDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
James W SalazarDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Joanne ProbertSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Alan IwahashiDepartment of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, California.
Jeffrey E OlginSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Phillip UrsellDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco.
Amy HartOffice of Chief Medical Examiner, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ellen MoffattOffice of Chief Medical Examiner, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Zian H TsengSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · USOffice of Chief Medical Examiner · USKaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center · US

Funding

Comprehensive autopsy characterization of sudden cardiac deathR01HL102090 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI TSENG, ZIAN H · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL102090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: QT-prolonging medications (QTPMs) are a reported risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) when defined by consensus criteria that presume an arrhythmic cause. The effect of QTPM on autopsy-defined sudden arrhythmic death (SAD) is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between QTPM and autopsy-defined SAD vs nonarrhythmic cause of sudden death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective countywide case-control study included World Health Organization-defined (presumed) SCD cases who underwent autopsy as part of the San Francisco Postmortem Systematic Investigation of Sudden Cardiac Death Study (POST SCD) to determine arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic cause, and control deaths due to trauma (hereinafter referred to as trauma controls) in San Francisco County, California, from February 1, 2011, to March 1, 2014. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate the association of QTPM with the risk of presumed SCD, autopsy-defined SAD, and non-SAD compared with trauma controls. Medication exposure, determined by prescription lists and postmortem toxicologic findings, was used to calculate a summative QTPM exposure score (range, 0-20). Data were analyzed from September 1, 2018, to June 15, 2019. Exposure: QT-prolonging medication exposure, as measured by QTPM score (1 indicated low; 2-4, moderate; and >4, high). Main Outcomes and Measures: Death due to trauma, presumed SCD, and autopsy-defined non-SAD and SAD with no postmortem findings of extracardiac cause. Results: A total of 629 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [15.7] years; 439 men [69.8%]) were included, 525 with presumed SCDs and 104 traumatic death controls. Individuals with presumed SCDs had higher exposure and were more likely to be taking any QTPM (291 [55.4%] vs 28 [26.9%]; P < .001) than trauma controls. Use of QTPMs was associated with increased risk of presumed SCD in low (odds ratio [OR], 2.25 [95% CI, 1.03-4.96]; P = .04) and high (OR, 6.70 [95% CI, 1.47-30.67]; P = .01) exposure groups. After autopsy adjudication, use of QTPMs was associated with increased risk of non-SAD (low-risk OR, 2.88 [95% CI, 1.18-6.99; P = .02]; moderate-risk OR, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.20-5.73; P = .02]; and high-risk OR, 14.22 [95% CI, 2.91-69.30; P = .001]) but not SAD in all exposure groups. This association was attenuated by the exclusion of occult overdose non-SADs in the highest exposure group. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings confirm the association between QTPMs and presumed SCD; however, after autopsy, this risk was specific for nonarrhythmic causes of sudden death. Studies using consensus SCD criteria may overestimate the association of QTPMs with the risk of SAD.

Indexed as

AgedArrhythmias, CardiacAutopsyCase-Control StudiesCause of DeathDeath, Sudden, CardiacFemaleHumansLong QT SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32119028
PMCPMC7052791
OpenAlexW3009577001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.