ArticleJAMA internal medicine2020
Association of QT-Prolonging Medications With Risk of Autopsy-Defined Causes of Sudden Death.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antipsychotics and the QTc Interval During Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Ventricular arrhythmias in acute heart failure: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Exercises in Clinical Reasoning: Beyond the Surface.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Acquired Long QT Syndrome: Ventricular Fibrillation in an Otherwise Healthy Young Female.Cureus · 2023Article
- Emergency Management of Electrical Storm: A Practical Overview.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Drug-induced Sudden Death: A Scoping Review.Current drug safety · 2023Article
- HIV-Tat Exacerbates the Actions of Atazanavir, Efavirenz, and Ritonavir on Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor (RyR2).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Arrhythmogenic Risk and Mechanisms of QT-Prolonging Drugs to Treat COVID-19.Cardiac electrophysiology clinics · 2022Review
- The best QT correction formula in a non-hospitalized population: the Fasa PERSIAN cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Prevalence of potentially harmful multidrug interactions on medication lists of elderly ambulatory patients.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Review
- Genetic investigations of 100 inherited cardiac disease-related genes in deceased individuals with schizophrenia.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Cardiac Corrected QT Interval Changes Among Patients Treated for COVID-19 Infection During the Early Phase of the Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Effects on QT interval of hydroxychloroquine associated with ritonavir/darunavir or azithromycin in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Heart and vessels · 2021Article
- Article
- Arrhythmic safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients from different clinical settings.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020Article
- Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 - A narrative review.The Indian journal of tuberculosis · 2020Review
- Arrhythmic profile and 24-hour QT interval variability in COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.International journal of cardiology · 2020Article
- Acute chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine toxicity: A review for emergency clinicians.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2020Review
- Assessment of Racial Differences in Rates of Autopsy in the US, 2008-2017.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: QT-prolonging medications (QTPMs) are a reported risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) when defined by consensus criteria that presume an arrhythmic cause. The effect of QTPM on autopsy-defined sudden arrhythmic death (SAD) is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between QTPM and autopsy-defined SAD vs nonarrhythmic cause of sudden death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective countywide case-control study included World Health Organization-defined (presumed) SCD cases who underwent autopsy as part of the San Francisco Postmortem Systematic Investigation of Sudden Cardiac Death Study (POST SCD) to determine arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic cause, and control deaths due to trauma (hereinafter referred to as trauma controls) in San Francisco County, California, from February 1, 2011, to March 1, 2014. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate the association of QTPM with the risk of presumed SCD, autopsy-defined SAD, and non-SAD compared with trauma controls. Medication exposure, determined by prescription lists and postmortem toxicologic findings, was used to calculate a summative QTPM exposure score (range, 0-20). Data were analyzed from September 1, 2018, to June 15, 2019. Exposure: QT-prolonging medication exposure, as measured by QTPM score (1 indicated low; 2-4, moderate; and >4, high). Main Outcomes and Measures: Death due to trauma, presumed SCD, and autopsy-defined non-SAD and SAD with no postmortem findings of extracardiac cause. Results: A total of 629 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [15.7] years; 439 men [69.8%]) were included, 525 with presumed SCDs and 104 traumatic death controls. Individuals with presumed SCDs had higher exposure and were more likely to be taking any QTPM (291 [55.4%] vs 28 [26.9%]; P < .001) than trauma controls. Use of QTPMs was associated with increased risk of presumed SCD in low (odds ratio [OR], 2.25 [95% CI, 1.03-4.96]; P = .04) and high (OR, 6.70 [95% CI, 1.47-30.67]; P = .01) exposure groups. After autopsy adjudication, use of QTPMs was associated with increased risk of non-SAD (low-risk OR, 2.88 [95% CI, 1.18-6.99; P = .02]; moderate-risk OR, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.20-5.73; P = .02]; and high-risk OR, 14.22 [95% CI, 2.91-69.30; P = .001]) but not SAD in all exposure groups. This association was attenuated by the exclusion of occult overdose non-SADs in the highest exposure group. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings confirm the association between QTPMs and presumed SCD; however, after autopsy, this risk was specific for nonarrhythmic causes of sudden death. Studies using consensus SCD criteria may overestimate the association of QTPMs with the risk of SAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.