ArticleOptics express2020
Comparison of data-acquisition designs for single-shot edge-illumination X-ray phase-contrast tomography.
Article in Optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Edge-illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Edge-illumination X-ray phase-contrast tomography (EIXPCT) is an emerging technique that enables practical phase-contrast imaging with laboratory-based X-ray sources. A joint reconstruction method was proposed for reconstructing EIXPCT images, enabling novel flexible data-acquisition designs. However, only limited efforts have been devoted to optimizing data-acquisition designs for use with the joint reconstruction method. In this study, several promising designs are introduced, such as the constant aperture position (CAP) strategy and the alternating aperture position (AAP) strategy covering different angular ranges. In computer-simulation studies, these designs are analyzed and compared. Experimental data are employed to test the designs in real-world applications. All candidate designs are also compared for their implementation complexity. The tradeoff between data-acquisition time and image quality is discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.