ArticleMedicine2020
Association between biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and incident hypertension in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from prospective nationwide KOBIO Registry.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in administrative health databases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- The Cardiovascular Safety of Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Arthritic Conditions: A Structured Review with Recommendations.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Risk Factor and Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Cardio-rheumatology: the cardiovascular, pharmacological, and surgical risks associated with rheumatological diseases in women.Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology · 2024Review
- Role of Inflammatory Cytokines in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Development of Atherosclerosis: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Rheumatoid arthritis study of the Egyptian College of Rheumatology (ECR): nationwide presentation and worldwide stance.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Accelerated Atherosclerosis, New Biomarkers, and the Effects of Biological Therapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Korean College of Rheumatology: 40 Years of Public Health Influence.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2022Article
- Therapeutic targeting of inflammation in hypertension: from novel mechanisms to translational perspective.Cardiovascular research · 2021Review
- KOBIO, the First Web-based Korean Biologics Registry Operated With a Unified Platform Among Distinct Disease Entities.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been some debate between biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) treatment and hypertension (HTN) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of bDMARDs on the development of HTN in patients with RA.A total of 996 patients eligible for analysis were recruited from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics & Targeted Therapy (KOBIO) registry from 2012 to 2018. The bDMARDs were tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, abatacept, and tocilizumab. The cDMARDs included methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and leflunomide. The incidence rate and 95% confidence interval of HTN were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratio (HR) of risk factors associated with hypertension was assessed by cox proportional hazard model analysis.Among the 996 patients, 62 patients (6.2%) were newly diagnosed with HTN. There were differences in incidence rate of HTN among conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs), TNF inhibitors, tocilizumab, and abatacept during the follow-up period (P = .015). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was a significant difference in incident HTN only between cDMARDs and tocilizumab (P = .001). Systolic blood pressure and positive rheumatoid factor were associated with development of HTN (HR = 1.049, P = .016 and HR = 1.386, P = .010, respectively). Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed no difference in the development of HTN between bDMARDs and cDMARDs in RA.This study showed that bDMARDs treatment might not increase risk of incident HTN in patients with RA, compared to cDMARDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.