ArticleMedicine2020
Comparison of xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix and skin grafts in reconstruction of postoperative defects of hypopharyngeal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Posterior Hypopharyngeal/Upper Esophageal Wall Reconstruction Using a Double-Island Free Fasciocutaneous Anterolateral Thigh Flap: A Case Report and Scoping Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Acellular dermal matrices in reconstructive surgery; history, current implications and future perspectives for surgeons.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful reconstruction after tumor resection facilitates rapid recovery and retention of good quality of life, and this is important for a successful operation. This study aimed to analyze and compare the application and efficacy of xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix (xeno-ADM) and abdominal skin graft in hypopharynx reconstruction.This is a retrospective cohort study that included 25 patients with posterior hypopharyngeal wall cancer who underwent partial hypopharyngectomy with laryngeal preservation. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the repair materials used. Eleven patients were treated with xeno-ADM, and 14 patients with abdominal skin grafts for repairing hypopharyngeal mucosal defects. The intraoperative data, postoperative recovery time of eating function, graft contraction, infection and pharyngeal fistula rate, and 1-year survival rate of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared.Compared with skin grafts group (23.1 ± 5.8 days), the recovery time of eating function in xeno-ADM group was shorter (17.3 ± 6.4 days), (P = .026). Also the number of postoperative hospitalization days were less in the xeno-ADM group (18.5 ± 6.7 days) than in the skin grafts group (24.1 ± 5.6 days) (P = .035). Besides, no significant differences were observed in other comparisons between the 2 groups. Also no obvious rejection and severe graft contraction were observed in both the groups. All patients were successfully decannulated.Both xeno-ADM and abdominal skin grafts demonstrated good effects in the reconstruction of hypopharynx, but the recovery time of eating function in patients with xeno-ADM was faster, which may be due to rapid epithelialization. In addition, it avoids trauma of donor sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.