Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32118762›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Low intra-abdominal pressure and deep neuromuscular blockade laparoscopic surgery and surgical space conditions: A meta-analysis.

Yiyong Wei, Jia Li, Fude Sun, Donghang Zhang, Ming Li, Yunxia Zuo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05689957 (Evaluation of Surgical Condition During Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgery in Patient With Moderate vs Deep Neuromuscular Block in Lower Pressure Pneumoperitoneum), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05689957 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Surgical Condition During Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgery in Patient With Moderate vs Deep Neuromuscular Block in Lower Pressure Pneumoperitoneum

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Sains MalaysiaRan2020 to 2022Enrolled70ConditionsGynecologic Disease, Neuromuscular BlockadeArmsDeep neuromuscular block using intravenous rocuronium induction at 1.2mg/kg and maintainance of 8-12mcg/kg/min for deep neuromuscular block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yiyong WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan.
Jia LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan.
Fude SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Penglai Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Penglai, Shandong, China.
Donghang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan.
Ming LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan.
Yunxia ZuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) are frequently used in laparoscopic abdominal surgery to improve surgical space conditions and decrease postoperative pain. The evidence supporting operations using low IAP and deep NMB is open to debate.

methodsThe feasibility of the routine use of low IAP +deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery was examined. A meta-analysis is conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the influence of low IAP + deep NMB vs. low IAP + moderate NMB, standard IAP +deep NMB, and standard IAP + moderate NMB during laparoscopic procedures on surgical space conditions, the duration of surgery and postoperative pain. RCTs were identified using the Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from initiation to June 2019. Our search identified 9 eligible studies on the use of low IAP + deep NMB and surgical space conditions.

resultsLow IAP + deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery did not improve the surgical space conditions when compared with the use of moderate NMB, with a mean difference (MD) of -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.55-0.37). Subgroup analyses showed improved surgical space conditions with the use of low IAP + deep NMB compared with low IAP + moderate NMB, (MD = 0.63 [95% CI:0.06-1.19]), and slightly worse conditions compared with the use of standard IAP + deep NMB and standard IAP + moderate NMB, with MDs of -1.13(95% CI:-1.47 to 0.79) and -0.87(95% CI:-1.30 to 0.43), respectively. The duration of surgery did not improve with low IAP + deep NMB, (MD = 1.72 [95% CI: -1.69 to 5.14]), and no significant reduction in early postoperative pain was found in the deep-NMB group (MD = -0.14 [95% CI: -0.51 to 0.23]).

conclusionLow IAP +deep NMB is not significantly more effective than other IAP +NMB combinations for optimizing surgical space conditions, duration of surgery, or postoperative pain in this meta-analysis. Whether the use of low IAP + deep NMB results in fewer intraoperative complications, enhanced quality of recovery or both after laparoscopic surgery should be studied in the future.

Indexed as

Abdominal CavityHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyNeuromuscular BlockadePressure

Identifiers

PMID32118762
PMCPMC7478474
OpenAlexW3010478618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.