Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32118456›Full record

ArticleThe American psychologist2021

Reducing mental health disparities by increasing the personal relevance of interventions.

Gordon C Nagayama Hall, Elliot T Berkman, Nolan W Zane, Frederick T L Leong, Wei-Chin Hwang, Arthur M Nezu, Christine Maguth Nezu, Janie J Hong, Joyce P Chu, Ellen R Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American psychologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Gordon C Nagayama HallDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene.ORCID 0000-0003-1265-1700
Elliot T BerkmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene.ORCID 0000-0002-7113-5792
Nolan W ZaneDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Frederick T L LeongDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University.ORCID 0000-0001-5598-0390
Wei-Chin HwangDepartment of Psychology, Claremont McKenna College.ORCID 0000-0001-9762-2575
Arthur M NezuDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-2102
Christine Maguth NezuDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University.
Janie J HongRedwood Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research.ORCID 0000-0002-5343-9522
Joyce P ChuDepartment of Psychology, Palo Alto University.
Ellen R HuangDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene.ORCID 0000-0001-9746-7448
University of Oregon · USDrexel University · USBeck Institute for Cognitive Behavior Therapy · USClaremont McKenna College · USMichigan State University · USPalo Alto University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Supplement to Prevention Research Center: Parenting Among Women Who Are Opioid Users, Project 2P50DA048756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI FISHER, PHILIP A, LEVE, LESLIE DIANE · 2019 to 2023
$18.0M
Construal level as a novel pathway for affect regulation and cancer controlR01CA240452 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BERKMAN, ELLIOT TODD · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Devaluing Energy-Dense Foods for Cancer Control: Translational NeuroscienceR01CA211224 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BERKMAN, ELLIOT TODD · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211224NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240452NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA048756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most persistent health disparities is the underutilization of mental health services by people of color. Neither evidence-based treatments (universal focus) nor culturally adapted treatments (group focus) have reduced these disparities. We propose the personal relevance of psychotherapy (PROP) model, which integrates universal, group, and individual dimensions to determine the personal relevance of interventions. A cultural example of personal relevance among people of East Asian ancestry involves "face" (i.e., one's prestige and position in society), which may moderate treatment outcomes. Pragmatic intervention approaches focused on helping individuals cope with specific external problems, compared to managing a "personal" disease, can effectively "restore" face. Thus, social problem-solving interventions may be more personally relevant to many people of East Asian ancestry than are approaches that are internally focused. In addition, we posit that social neuroscience can offer unique opportunities above and beyond self-report measures when assessing the impact of PROP and the personal relevance of interventions for diverse populations. Our preliminary evidence upon testing this hypothesis indicated that among Asian Americans, exposure to problem-solving therapy content elicited significantly greater neural activity in brain areas associated with personal relevance compared to exposure to cognitive-behavioral therapy content. Identifying personally relevant interventions has the potential to reduce mental health disparities by increasing engagement with mental health services for diverse groups. The increased client engagement produced by personally relevant interventions also has the potential to make mental health services more effective for diverse groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cultural CharacteristicsCultural CompetencyHealthcare DisparitiesSocial SciencesAsianCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansMental HealthMental Health Services

Identifiers

PMID32118456
PMCPMC8034200
OpenAlexW3010128499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.