ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2020
Primary culture of aspiration residual specimens improves the diagnostic accuracy between hepatocellular carcinoma and benign nodules.
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limited sorafenib anticancer effects on primary cultured hepatocellular carcinoma cells with high NANOG expression.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Primary culture of aspiration residual specimens improves the diagnostic accuracy between hepatocellular carcinoma and benign nodules.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Results of fine-needle aspiration of hepatic nodules may be equivocal to confuse clinical judgment. The utility of primary culture of aspiration residual specimens to improve the accuracy in differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma and benign lesions was investigated. A total of 337 patients (hepatocellular carcinoma proven by aspiration 277, by other modalities 35, benign nodules 25) were included. The growth patterns of cancer cells at the 14th day of primary culture from aspiration proven hepatocellular carcinoma patients were applied as criteria for analysis. Hepatocellular carcinoma proven by aspiration showed higher incidence of outgrowth of cancer cells than those not proven by aspiration or the incidence of outgrowth of hepatocyte antigen positive cells in benign lesions (all P < .02). To differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from benign nodules measuring ≤2 cm, growth patterns as item showed similar sensitivity and accuracy to aspiration results. The negative predictive values for the above two items in differential diagnosis were all below 45% in nodules measuring either ≤ or >2 cm. Using at least one positive result of growth patterns or aspiration as item for differential diagnosis increased the sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy, but little decreased the specificity and positive predictive value as compared with aspiration results alone in nodules measuring either ≤ or >2 cm. In conclusion, the growth patterns at the 14th day of primary culture can be applied for dynamic interpretation of the specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration between hepatocellular carcinoma and benign lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.