ArticleACS omega2020
Post-SELEX Optimization and Characterization of a Prostate Cancer Cell-Specific Aptamer for Diagnosis.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical Evaluation of a Radiolabeled Anti-PSMA Dimeric Aptamer in a Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven SELEX Design of Aptamer Panels for Urinary Multi-Biomarker Detection in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Emerging Biohybrids of Aptamer-Based Nano-Biosensing Technologies for Effective Early Cancer Detection.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Review
- DNA framework signal amplification platform-based high-throughput systemic immune monitoring.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Article
- Aptamers Targeting Membrane Proteins for Sensor and Diagnostic Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Aptamers as Theragnostic Tools in Prostate Cancer.Biomolecules · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The RNA aptamer A4 binds specifically to tumor prostate cells. A4 was modified (mA4) by adding deoxyribonucleotides to its ends to remove the reactive 2' hydroxyl groups of RNA's sugar at the ends of the aptamer and to make it more stable to widespread RNase contamination in laboratories. Thus, mA4 would be more suitable to use in the clinical settings of prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to characterize this optimized oligonucleotide to verify its potential as a diagnostic tool. The sequences and structures of A4 and mA4 were compared through in silico approaches to corroborate their similarity. Then, the degradation of mA4 was measured in appropriate media and human plasma for in vitro tests. In addition, the binding abilities of A4 to prostate cells were contrasted with those of mA4. The effects of mA4 were assessed on the viability, proliferation, and migration of human prostate cell lines RWPE-1 and PC-3 in three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures. mA4 showed configurational motifs similar to those of A4, displayed a half-life in plasma substantially higher than A4, and exhibited a comparable binding capacity to that of A4 and unaltered viability, proliferation, and migration of prostatic cells. Therefore, mA4 maintains the crucial 3D structures of A4 that would allow binding to its target, as suggested by in silico and binding analyses. mA4 may be a good PCa reporter as it does not change cellular parameters of prostate cells when incubated with it. Its additional deoxyribonucleotides make mA4 inherently more chemically stable than A4, avoiding its degradation and favoring its storage and handling for clinical applications. These characteristics support the potential of mA4 to be used in diagnostic systems for PCa.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.