Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32118083›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Risk Factors for Early Subsequent (Revision or Contralateral) ACL Reconstruction: A Retrospective Database Study.

Matthew C Gallo, Ioanna K Bolia, Omid Jalali, Santano Rosario, Alexis Rounds, Keemia Soraya Heidari, Nicholas A Trasolini, John P Prodromo, George Frederick Hatch, Alexander Evan Weber

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew C GalloUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ioanna K BoliaEpstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Omid JalaliUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Santano RosarioUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Alexis RoundsUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Keemia Soraya HeidariUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nicholas A TrasoliniEpstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
John P ProdromoEpstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
George Frederick HatchEpstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Alexander Evan WeberEpstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany factors contribute to the risk for subsequent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) within 2 years from the index procedure. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to evaluate the incidence of subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR at 2 years in a large cohort and (2) to explore the association between patient-specific factors and early subsequent ACLR risk by age group. We hypothesize that 2-year subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR rates will be low and that risk factors for subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR will vary depending on a patient's age group. STUDY

designCase-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsThe California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Ambulatory Surgery Database was retrospectively reviewed to assess the incidence of 2-year subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR and to identify patient-specific risk factors for early subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR by age group between 2005 and 2014.

resultsOf 94,108 patients included, the rate of subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR was highest in patients younger than 21 years (2.4 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 2.3-2.6) and lowest in those older than 40 years (1.3 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4). Younger age, white race (compared with Hispanic in all age groups and Asian in age <21 or >40 years), private insurance if age younger than 21 years, public insurance or worker's compensation claims if age older than 30 years were significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR at 2 years.

conclusionResults of the present study provide insight into subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACL reconstruction, which can be used to assess and modify treatment for at-risk patients and highlight the need for data mining to generate clinically applicable research using national and international databases.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionanterior cruciate ligamentcontralateralrevisionrisk factorssubsequent surgery

Identifiers

PMID32118083
PMCPMC7029539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.