Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32117950›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Influence of the Fabrication Accuracy of Hot-Embossed PCL Scaffolds on Cell Growths.

Tania Limongi, Elisabetta Dattola, Cirino Botta, Maria Laura Coluccio, Patrizio Candeloro, Maria Cucè, Bernadette Scopacasa, Maria Eugenia Gallo Cantafio, Costantino Davide Critello, Salvatore Andrea Pullano and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bone Regeneration and Oxidative Stress: An Updated Overview.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tania LimongiDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elisabetta DattolaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Cirino BottaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Laura ColuccioDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Patrizio CandeloroDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria CucèDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Bernadette ScopacasaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Eugenia Gallo CantafioDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Costantino Davide CritelloDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Salvatore Andrea PullanoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonino S FiorilloDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Pierosandro TagliaferriDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Pierfrancesco TassoneDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Ernesto LamannaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Enzo Di FabrizioDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gerardo PerozzielloDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · ITKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SAPolytechnic University of Turin · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer widely used for the realization of 3D scaffold for tissue engineering applications. The hot embossing technique (HE) allows the obtainment of PCL scaffolds with a regular array of micro pillars on their surface. The main drawback affecting this kind of micro fabrication process is that such structural superficial details can be damaged when detaching the replica from the mold. Therefore, the present study has focused on the optimization of the HE processes through the development of an analytical model for the prediction of the demolding force as a function of temperature. This model allowed calculating the minimum demolding force to obtain regular micropillars without defects. We demonstrated that the results obtained by the analytical model agree with the experimental data. To address the importance of controlling accurately the fabricated microstructures, we seeded on the PCL scaffolds human stromal cell line (HS-5) and monocytic leukemia cell line (THP-1) to evaluate how the presence of regular or deformed pillars affect cells viability.

Indexed as

cell viabilitydemolding forcehot embossingmicrostructured scaffoldspolycaprolactone

Identifiers

PMID32117950
PMCPMC7033415
OpenAlexW3005644746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.