ArticlePeerJ2020
Development and validation of statistical shape models of the primary functional bone segments of the foot.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shape predicts osteoarthritis progression in the first carpometacarpal joint.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- From Skin to Skeleton: A Statistical Shape Modelling Approach for Predicting Hand and Foot Bony Geometry.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Impact of quantified knee positioning on the measurement of minimal joint space width using statistical shape models: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis in the IMI-APPROACH.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
- Statistical Shape Modeling Characterization of Cavovarus Deformity Between Demyelinating and Axonal Subtypes of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.Foot & ankle international · 2025Article
- Osseous morphology differences in the foot and ankle associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.JBMR plus · 2025Article
- Article
- OpenHands: An Open-Source Statistical Shape Model of the Finger Bones.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Influence of Talar and Calcaneal Morphology on Subtalar Kinematics During Walking.Foot & ankle international · 2024Article
- Human foot form and function: variable and versatile, yet sufficiently related to predict function from form.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Database of segmentations and surface models of bones of the entire lower body created from cadaver CT scans.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Insights Afforded by Shape Modeling in the Foot and Ankle.Foot and ankle clinics · 2023Review
- Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023Article
- [Rapid femur modeling method based on statistical shape model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022Article
- A toolbox for the retrodeformation and muscle reconstruction of fossil specimens in Blender.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Are early antero-posterior and lateral radiographs predictive of clubfoot relapse requiring surgical intervention in children treated by Ponseti method?Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Toward improved understanding of foot shape, foot posture, and foot biomechanics during running: A narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Statistical shape modeling of the talocrural joint using a hybrid multi-articulation joint approach.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Morphologic analysis of the subtalar joint using statistical shape modeling.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020Article
- Targeted Achilles Tendon Training and Rehabilitation Using Personalized and Real-Time Multiscale Models of the Neuromusculoskeletal System.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMusculoskeletal models are important tools for studying movement patterns, tissue loading, and neuromechanics. Personalising bone anatomy within models improves analysis accuracy. Few studies have focused on personalising foot bone anatomy, potentially incorrectly estimating the foot's contribution to locomotion. Statistical shape models have been created for a subset of foot-ankle bones, but have not been validated. This study aimed to develop and validate statistical shape models of the functional segments in the foot: first metatarsal, midfoot (second-to-fifth metatarsals, cuneiforms, cuboid, and navicular), calcaneus, and talus; then, to assess reconstruction accuracy of these shape models using sparse anatomical data.
methodsMagnetic resonance images of 24 individuals feet (age = 28 ± 6 years, 52% female, height = 1.73 ± 0.8 m, mass = 66.6 ± 13.8 kg) were manually segmented to generate three-dimensional point clouds. Point clouds were registered and analysed using principal component analysis. For each bone segment, a statistical shape model and principal components were created, describing population shape variation. Statistical shape models were validated by assessing reconstruction accuracy in a leave-one-out cross validation. Statistical shape models were created by excluding a participant's bone segment and used to reconstruct that same excluded bone using full segmentations and sparse anatomical data (i.e. three discrete points on each segment), for all combinations in the dataset. Tali were not reconstructed using sparse anatomical data due to a lack of externally accessible landmarks. Reconstruction accuracy was assessed using Jaccard index, root mean square error (mm), and Hausdorff distance (mm).
resultsReconstructions generated using full segmentations had mean Jaccard indices between 0.77 ± 0.04 and 0.89 ± 0.02, mean root mean square errors between 0.88 ± 0.19 and 1.17 ± 0.18 mm, and mean Hausdorff distances between 2.99 ± 0.98 mm and 6.63 ± 3.68 mm. Reconstructions generated using sparse anatomical data had mean Jaccard indices between 0.67 ± 0.06 and 0.83 ± 0.05, mean root mean square error between 1.21 ± 0.54 mm and 1.66 ± 0.41 mm, and mean Hausdorff distances between 3.21 ± 0.94 mm and 7.19 ± 3.54 mm. Jaccard index was higher (
conclusionFor the first time, statistical shape models of the primary functional segments of the foot were developed and validated. Foot segments can be reconstructed with minimal error using full segmentations and sparse anatomical landmarks. In future, larger training datasets could increase statistical shape model robustness, extending use to paediatric or pathological populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.