ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2020
Is it possible to improve long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with appropriate patient selection?
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Safety of Abdominal Contouring in the Presence of a Gastric Band.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- It is really time to retire laparoscopic gastric banding? Positive outcomes after long-term follow-up: the management is the key.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- Does Postoperative Oral and Intestinal Microbiota Correlate with the Weight-Loss Following Bariatric Surgery?-A Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe gastric band is still offered as a good bariatric option for highly motivated and carefully selected patients. The question is whether this faith is justified or not.
aimTo assess long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) at a single bariatric center and to examine variables associated with patients' adherence to scheduled postoperative appointments. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective review of patients who underwent LAGB between 2004 and 2009 was performed. The initial cohort included 167 patients. Data regarding sex, age, preoperative weight, hometown population and distance from the bariatric center, and gastric band volume were collected. Compliance was measured as the number of postoperative appointments. Clinical outcome was defined as percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at the end of the observation period or at band removal.
resultsThe LAGB was performed in 167 patients between 2004 and 2009. The mean follow-up time was 90 ±24 months. Five (3%) patients were lost to follow-up; 37 (22.2%) had their band removed. The remaining 125 (74.8%) patients retained their bands and were included in the analysis. The mean %EWL was 33.0 ±26.6%. Thirty-one (18.6%) patients achieved %EWL > 50%.
conclusionsThis study found that LAGB was not an effective bariatric procedure in long-term observation. Only 25% of 125 patients who maintained a functioning band achieved %EWL > 50%. Compliance was the only independent prognostic factor for weight loss. Other factors had no influence on outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.