Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32117392›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020

Principles, Applications, and Biosafety of Plant Genome Editing Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Kaoutar El-Mounadi, María Luisa Morales-Floriano, Hernan Garcia-Ruiz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Evolution of aromatic amino acid metabolism in plants: a key driving force behind plant chemical diversity in aromatic natural products.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Dyslipidemia: A Narrative Review on Pharmacotherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. CRISPR/Cas9 as a Mutagenic Factor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaoutar El-MounadiDepartment of Biology, Kuztown University of Pennsylvania, Kuztown, PA, United States.
María Luisa Morales-FlorianoRecursos Genéticos y Productividad-Genética, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco, Montecillo, Mexico.
Hernan Garcia-RuizDepartment of Plant Pathology and Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.

Funding

Recognition and recruitment of RNA viruses into RNA silencing pathwaysR01GM120108 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI GARCIA-RUIZ, HERNAN · 2016 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The terms genome engineering, genome editing, and gene editing, refer to modifications (insertions, deletions, substitutions) in the genome of a living organism. The most widely used approach to genome editing nowadays is based on Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9). In prokaryotes, CRISPR-Cas9 is an adaptive immune system that naturally protects cells from DNA virus infections. CRISPR-Cas9 has been modified to create a versatile genome editing technology that has a wide diversity of applications in medicine, agriculture, and basic studies of gene functions. CRISPR-Cas9 has been used in a growing number of monocot and dicot plant species to enhance yield, quality, and nutritional value, to introduce or enhance tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, among other applications. Although biosafety concerns remain, genome editing is a promising technology with potential to contribute to food production for the benefit of the growing human population. Here, we review the principles, current advances and applications of CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing in crop improvement. We also address biosafety concerns and show that humans have been exposed to Cas9 protein homologues long before the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in genome editing.

Indexed as

biosafety regulationsCas9 human exposureCRISPR-Cas9genome editingplant breeding

Identifiers

PMID32117392
PMCPMC7031443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.